The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A reconsideration of the economic consequences of marital dissolution
Open accessAbstract
We use longitudinal data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics to assess the economic consequences of divorce and separation for the women and men involved. In contrast to previous studies focusing exclusively on those who remain unmarried, our approach integrates the probability of remarriage into the analysis and produces a much less dramatic picture of change in economic status than analyses not incorporating remarriage. However, we also find evidence of selection bias in the subgroup of women who remarry, suggesting that currently unmarried women might not improve their economic status through remarriage as much as women who have remarried.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779
Becker, G. S. (1973) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260084 · Cited by 3,484
Becker, G. S. (1974) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260287 · Cited by 898
Using Sample Survey Weights in Multiple Regression Analyses of Stratified Samples
Dumouchel, W. H., & Duncan, G. J. (1983) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1983.10478006 · Cited by 562
Self-citationFive Thousand American Families: Patterns of Economic Progress
Vatter, H. G. (1981) · Journal of Economic Issues · doi:10.1080/00213624.1981.11503955 · Cited by 213
Cited by
The Ties that Bind: Principles of Cohesion in Cohabitation and Marriage
Brines, J., & Joyner, K. (1999) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312249906400302 · Cited by 614
Anderson, D. K., & Saunders, D. G. (2003) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838002250769 · Cited by 462
Why Have Women Become Left-Wing? The Political Gender Gap and the Decline in Marriage
Edlund, L., & Pande, R. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302760193922 · Cited by 454
Children and Marital Disruption
Waite, L. J., & Lillard, L. A. (1991) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/229613 · Cited by 414
Predictors of Divorce Adjustment: Stressors, Resources, and Definitions
Wang, H., & Amato, P. R. (2000) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00655.x · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Duncan, G. J., & Hoffman, S. D.
- Venue
- Demography
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 1985-11-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 485-497
- ISSN
- 0070-3370 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-7790
- OpenAlex
- W2013443502
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 23.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A reconsideration of the economic consequences of marital dissolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2061584
- The paper
- Duncan, G. J., & Hoffman, S. D. (1985). A reconsideration of the economic consequences of marital dissolution. Demography. https://doi.org/10.2307/2061584
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.