Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,037

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does Marriage Matter?

Open access
Waite, Linda J.·1995·Demography

Abstract

The last several years have witnessed an active-sometimes acrimonious-debate, occasionally joined by demographers, over the state of the family.Some, like David Popenoe (1993), decry what they see as a dangerous erosion of the family as an institution, with dire consequences for society.Others, like Judith Stacey (1993), see the traditional family, balanced on the monogamous couple, as fundamentally incompatible with women's well-being.Although these two positions seem extreme, both have numerous adherents and are held by serious scholars.When politicians point to the high social costs and taxpayer burden imposed by disintegrating "family values," they overlook the fact that individuals do not simply make the decisions that lead to unwed parenthood, marriage, or divorce on the basis of what is good for society.They weigh the costs and benefits of each of these choices to themselves-and sometimes their children.But how much do individuals know about these costs and benefits?I think that we as demographers have something to contribute here.As individual researchers we investigate the relationship between marriage and longevity, wealth, earnings, or children's achievements, but we rarely try to pull all this evidence together.I would like to argue that we have an opportunity and an obligation to do that, and to tell people what their decisions about marriage and family potentially mean for them as individuals.That is my objective here. Trends in Marriage and CohabitationLet us review, first, trends in marriage over the last four decades.Figure I shows the proportions of the adult population age 15 and over currently not married for the period 1950 through 1993, taken from decennial censuses and March Current Population Surveys.Although black men and women had higher proportions unmarried in 1950 than did white men and women, these differences were modest.Since that time, marriage patterns have diverged dramatically for the races.Figure 1 shows that the proportion of the population age 15 and older which is currently "unmarried" has increased for both whites and blacks, but with especially striking rises for blacks, so that in 1993,61 % of black women and 58% of black men were not married, compared with 38% of white men and 41% of white women.Insofar as marriage "matters," black men and women are much less likely than whites to share in the benefits, and much less likely today than a generation ago.Figure 2 depicts the proportions of men and women age 15 and older who have never married for the period from 1950 to 1993.This figure shows that for blacks, much of the

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2061670

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,037

Metadata

Authors
Waite, L. J.
Venue
Demography
Published
1995-11-01
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
483-507
ISSN
  • 0070-3370 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-7790
OpenAlex
W2065584569
Cited by
1,037
References
1
FWCI
43.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does Marriage Matter? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2061670
The paper
Waite, L. J. (1995). Does Marriage Matter? Demography. https://doi.org/10.2307/2061670

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.