Cited by 25,422Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsPsychology of Development and Education

Social Learning Theory

Kytle, Jackson, Bandura, Albert·1978·Contemporary Sociology

Abstract

Una exploracion de los avances contemporaneos en la teoria del aprendizaje social, con especial enfasis en los importantes roles que cumplen los procesos cognitivos, indirectos, y autoregulatorios.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2065952

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 25,422

Authors
Kytle, J., & Bandura, A.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
Contemporary Sociology
Published
1978-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
84
ISSN
0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1550621568
Cited by
25,422
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 915 · 2024: 764 · 2023: 690 · 2022: 731 · 2021: 1115 · 2020: 1378 · 2019: 1119 · 2018: 1025 · 2017: 1157 · 2016: 1195 · 2015: 1345 · 2014: 1253 · 2013: 1230 · 2012: 1143
FWCI
188.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychology of Development and Education
Keywords
social learning theory, cognitive processes, self-regulation, indirect learning, observational learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review