Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,821

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Changing the Subject: Psychology, Social Regulation, and Subjectivity.

Wiley, Mary Glenn, Henriques, Julian, Holloway, Wendy, Urwin, Cathy, Venn, Couze, Walkerdine, Valerie·1985·Contemporary Sociology

Abstract

Changing the Subject is a classic critique of traditional psychology in which the foundations of critical and feminist psychology are laid down. Pioneering and foundational, it is still the groundbreaking text crucial to furthering the new psychology in both teaching and research. Now reissued with a new foreword describing the changes which have taken place over the last few years, Changing the Subject will continue to have a significant impact on thinking about psychology and social theory.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2069579

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,821

Metadata

Authors
Wiley, M. G., Henriques, J., Holloway, W., Urwin, C., Venn, C., & Walkerdine, V.
Venue
Contemporary Sociology
Published
1985-09
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
645
ISSN
0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050534102
Cited by
1,821
References
0
FWCI
18.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changing the Subject: Psychology, Social Regulation, and Subjectivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2069579
The paper
Wiley, M. G., Henriques, J., Holloway, W., Urwin, C., Venn, C., & Walkerdine, V. (1985). Changing the Subject: Psychology, Social Regulation, and Subjectivity. Contemporary Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2069579

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.