The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Statistical Analysis of Quasi-Experiments.
Abstract
The International Review of Administrative Sciences publishes original contributions on a wide range of topics related to public administration. The topics covered include the administration of international agencies and national civil services, the organization of central governments and regional administrations and the relationships between them. It also focuses on personnel management, administrative reform and public finance, and on the theory, philosophy and history of administration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Economic Shocks and Civil Conflict: An Instrumental Variables Approach
Miguel, E., Satyanath, S., & Sergenti, E. (2004) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/421174 · Cited by 2,460
Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation
King, G., Honaker, J., Joseph, A., & Scheve, K. (2001) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055401000235 · Cited by 1,834
The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation
Mutz, D. C. (2002) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/3088437 · Cited by 1,265
How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics
(1990) · doi:10.1093/pan/2.1.131 · Cited by 842
Political ignorance and collective policy preferences
Gilens, M. (2001) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055401002222 · Cited by 764
Metadata
- Authors
- Bollen, K. A., & Achen, C. H.
- Venue
- Contemporary Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1988-05
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 433
- ISSN
- 0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050596968
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Statistical Analysis of Quasi-Experiments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2069714
- The paper
- Bollen, K. A., & Achen, C. H. (1988). The Statistical Analysis of Quasi-Experiments. Contemporary Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2069714
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
