The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Frontiers in Social Movement Theory.
Abstract
Social protest movements such as the civil rights movement and the gay rights movement mobilize and sustain themselves in ways that have long been of interest to social scientists. In this book some of the most distinguished scholars in the area of collective action present new theories about this process, fashioning a rich and conceptually sophisticated social psychology of social movements that goes beyond theories currently in use. The book includes sometimes competing, sometimes complementary paradigms by theorists in resource mobilization, conflict, feminism, and collective action and by social psychologists and comparativists. These authors view the social movement actor from a more sociological perspective than do adherents of rational choice theory, and they analyze ways in which structural and cultural determinants influence the actor and generate or inhibit collective action and social change. The authors state that the collective identities and political consciousness of social movement actors are significantly shaped by their race, ethnicity, class, gender, or religion. Social structure--with its disparities in resources and opportunities--helps determine the nature of grievances, resources, and levels of organization. The book not only distinguishes the mobilization processes of consensus movements from those of conflict movements but also helps to explain the linkages between social movements, the state, and societal changes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science
Hippel, E. V., & Krogh, G. V. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.2.209.14992 · Cited by 2,145
Collective Identity Formation and the International State
Wendt, A. (1994) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2944711 · Cited by 1,575
Power Plays: How Social Movements and Collective Action Create New Organizational Forms
Rao, H., Morrill, C., & Zald, M. N. (2000) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(00)22007-8 · Cited by 872
Social Movements as Extra-Institutional Entrepreneurs: The Effect of Protests on Stock Price Returns
King, B. G., & Soule, S. A. (2007) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.52.3.413 · Cited by 729
Carrots and Rainbows: Motivation and Social Practice in Open Source Software Development1
von Krogh, G., Haefliger, S., Spaeth, S., & Wallin, M. W. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41703471 · Cited by 698
Metadata
- Authors
- Staggenborg, S., Morris, A. D., & Mueller, C. M.
- Venue
- Contemporary Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-07
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 553
- ISSN
- 0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2128399294
- Cited by
- 1,100
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 93.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2074413
- The paper
- Staggenborg, S., Morris, A. D., & Mueller, C. M. (1993). Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. Contemporary Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2074413
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.