The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Watergate in American Memory: How We Remember, Forget, and Reconstruct the Past.
Abstract
A look at what Americans remember (and what they have forgotten) about one of the most traumatic domestic political event in the America's post-war history.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
DiMaggio, P. (1997) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263 · Cited by 3,161
Social memories: Steps to a sociology of the past
Zerubavel, E. (1996) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1007/bf02393273 · Cited by 608
The impact of scandal on candidate evaluations: An experimental test of the role of candidate traits
Funk, C. L. (1996) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf01498658 · Cited by 301
Neiger, M. (2020) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12782 · Cited by 51
Trust and confidence: history, theory and socio-political implications
Morgner, C. (2013) · Human Studies · doi:10.1007/s10746-013-9281-1 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolfe, A., & Schudson, M.
- Venue
- Contemporary Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111
- ISSN
- 0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2150552370
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Watergate in American Memory: How We Remember, Forget, and Reconstruct the Past. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2075034
- The paper
- Wolfe, A., & Schudson, M. (1993). Watergate in American Memory: How We Remember, Forget, and Reconstruct the Past. Contemporary Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2075034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
