The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Legitimacy of the Court of Justice in the European Union: Models of Institutional Support
Abstract
Using a survey of mass publics, we investigate the political legitimacy of the Court of Justice of the European Communities. To what degree does the Court have the visibility and diffuse support necessary for legitimacy? What accounts for variability in support for the Court? Are theories developed largely in the American context generalizable in Western Europe to a transnational legal institution? Do the sources of the Court's legitimacy vary across nations, and how? Our analysis indicates that relatively obscure institutions such as the Court of Justice are unlikely to build support through satisfying their constituencies' demands. Without information about the Court of Justice, ordinary citizens form their views based on its connection with the European Union and its association with broad political and legal values. As the Court moves into the limelight of European law and politics, the decisions the judges make may increasingly shape citizens' perceptions of its legitimacy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics
Maddala, G. S. (1983) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511810176 · Cited by 13,240
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Zaller, J. R. (1992) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818691 · Cited by 7,785
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion.
Kenski, H. C., & Zaller, J. R. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074664 · Cited by 5,169
The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics
Inglehart, R. (2015) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400869589 · Cited by 3,723
The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics
Morse, E. L., & Inglehart, R. (1978) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20039864 · Cited by 3,566
A Systems Analysis of Political Life
Albrow, M. C., & Easton, D. (1966) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/589063 · Cited by 3,333
(1965) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,109
A re-assessment of the concept of political support.
Easton, D. (1975) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123400008309 · Cited by 3,088
Weiler, J. H. H. (1991) · The Yale Law Journal · doi:10.2307/796898 · Cited by 1,783
Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration
Burley, A.-M., & Mattli, W. (1993) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300004707 · Cited by 1,376
Cited by
Overcoming apartheid: can truth reconcile a divided nation?
Gibson *, J. L. (2004) · Politikon · doi:10.1080/0258934042000280698 · Cited by 244
Self-citation(2009) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Caldeira, G. A., & Gibson, J. L.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1995-06-01
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 356-376
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W1973667070
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 107.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Legitimacy of the Court of Justice in the European Union: Models of Institutional Support. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2082430
- The paper
- Caldeira, G. A., & Gibson, J. L. (1995). The Legitimacy of the Court of Justice in the European Union: Models of Institutional Support. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082430
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.