The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Organizational Alienation: A Comparative Analysis
Abstract
The relationship between two types of alienation-alienation from work and alienation from expressive relations-and two structural properties of organizations-centralization and formalization-are examined in a comparative study of sixteen welfare organizations. Both alienation from work and alienation from expressive relations are found to be more prominent in highly centralized and highly formalized organizations. Multivariate analysis is introduced to determine the relative importance of the relationships between measures of centralization and formalization and alienation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences
Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299305700304 · Cited by 4,343
Vlaar, P. W. L., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840606068338 · Cited by 219
Loyens, K., & Maesschalck, J. (2010) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/0095399710362524 · Cited by 142
Vlaar, P. W. L., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2007) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607078003 · Cited by 136
Al‐Hashimi, K., Weerakkody, V., Elbanna, S., & Schwarz, G. (2022) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13447 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Aiken, M., & Hage, J.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1966-08
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 497
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2312715924
- Cited by
- 551
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organizational Alienation: A Comparative Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2090773
- The paper
- Aiken, M., & Hage, J. (1966). Organizational Alienation: A Comparative Analysis. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2090773
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
