The Gifted Group at Mid-Life: Thirty-five Years' Follow-up of the Superior Child
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The most robust research support for identification practices with both short-term and long-term predictive validity is for the use of IQ and above-grade-level tests of more specific cognitive abilities.
“The most robust research support, in terms of identification practices that have both short-term (performance in accelerated classes) and long-term predictive validity (i.e., achievement in adulthood), is for the use of IQ (Lubinski 2016, Terman & Oden 1959) and above-grade-level tests of more specific cognitive abilities (Lubinski 2016, Makel et al. 2016).”
From Gifted Students (2019) · cites this paper as Terman & Oden 1959
Terman's gifted sample was superior to nongifted students on social, emotional, moral, and volitional traits.
“Terman & Oden (1959) reported that the group was superior to nongifted students on social, emotional, moral, and volitional traits.”
From Gifted Students (2019) · cites this paper as Terman & Oden 1959
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Worrell, F. C., Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Dixson, D. D. (2019) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102846 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
- Authors
- Strodtbeck, F. L., Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1960-06
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 439
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031453629
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Keywords
- gifted children, midlife, longitudinal follow-up, giftedness, adult development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
