The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Paradox of Group Size in Collective Action: A Theory of the Critical Mass. II.
Abstract
Many sociologists incorrectly believe that larger groups are less likely to support collective action than smaller ones. The effect of group size. infact, depends on costs. If the costs of collective goods rise with the number who share in them, larger groups act less frequently than smaller ones. If the costs vary little with group size, larger groups should exhibit more collective action than smaller ones because larger groups have more resources and are more likely to have a critical mass of highly interested and resourceful actors. The positive effects of group size increase with group heterogeneity and nonrandom social ties. Paradoxically, when groups are hetero geneous, fewer contributors may be needed to provide a good to larger groups, making collective action less complex and less expensive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure
Samuelson, P. A. (1954) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1925895 · Cited by 7,458
Ten years of research on group size and helping.
Latané, B., & Nida, S. (1981) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.89.2.308 · Cited by 749
Cited by
Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science
Hippel, E. V., & Krogh, G. V. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.2.209.14992 · Cited by 2,145
Social Movement Continuity: The Women's Movement in Abeyance
Taylor, V. (1989) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2117752 · Cited by 1,388
The Too-Much-of-a-Good-Thing Effect in Management
Pierce, J. R., & Aguinis, H. (2013) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311410060 · Cited by 1,085
Heterogeneity, Group Size and Collective Action: The Role of Institutions in Forest Management
Poteete, A. R., & Ostrom, E. (2004) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00360.x · Cited by 667
Traxler, F., Blaschke, S., & Kittel, B. (2001) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198295549.001.0001 · Cited by 523
Metadata
- Authors
- Oliver, P. E., & Marwell, G.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1988-02
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2058229508
- Cited by
- 554
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 49.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Paradox of Group Size in Collective Action: A Theory of the Critical Mass. II. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2095728
- The paper
- Oliver, P. E., & Marwell, G. (1988). The Paradox of Group Size in Collective Action: A Theory of the Critical Mass. II. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095728
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.