The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Affective Attachments to Nested Groups: A Choice-Process Theory
Abstract
This paper offers a theory linking choice processes with the experience of transitory emotion and the development of enduring affective attachments to nested collectivities, i.e., subgroups within a larger group, organization, or society. According to the theory, persons become emotionally attached to groups that strengthen their generalized sense of control. The underlying propositions are that: (1) choice processes that foster a high sense of control produce positive emotion (happiness, pride, gratitude); (2) such positive emotion strengthens affective attachments to groups perceived as most responsible for the choice opportunity; and (3) such positive emotion strengthens attachments to proximal subgroups more than to larger, more encompassing collectivities. Complementary predictions obtainfor lack of choice, negative emotion (sadness, shame, hostility), and the weakening of collective attachments. The theory explicates a subtle social process important to individuallgroup relations, and suggests conditions likely to produce behavior directed at the collective welfare.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.108.2.171 · Cited by 6,449
Cited by
An Affect Theory of Social Exchange
Lawler, E. J. (2001) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/324071 · Cited by 1,255
Self-citationToward a Fourth Generation of Revolutionary Theory
Goldstone, J. A. (2001) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.139 · Cited by 566
Go (Con)figure: Subgroups, Imbalance, and Isolates in Geographically Dispersed Teams
O'Leary, M. B., & Mortensen, M. (2010) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0434 · Cited by 377
“Generally speaking, research has shown that lower order identities are more subjectively important and relevant to the situation than higher-order identities (Brewer 1995; Lawler 1992).”
McAllister, D. J., Kamdar, D., Morrison, E. W., & Turban, D. B. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1200 · Cited by 318
Are there religious variations in marital infidelity?
Burdette, A. M., Ellison, C. G., Sherkat, D. E., & Gore, K. A. (2007) · Journal of Family Issues · doi:10.1177/0192513x07304269 · Cited by 223
Metadata
- Authors
- Lawler, E. J.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1992-06
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 327
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2320413671
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Affective Attachments to Nested Groups: A Choice-Process Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2096239
- The paper
- Lawler, E. J. (1992). Affective Attachments to Nested Groups: A Choice-Process Theory. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096239
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.