Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 372

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Re-Evaluation of the Economic Consequences of Divorce

Peterson, Richard R.·1996·American Sociological Review

Abstract

Over the last 20 years researchers have focused considerable attention on the economic consequences of divorce. One book Weitzmans The Divorce Revolution (1985) reports a 73 percent decline in womens standard of living after divorce and a 42 percent increase in mens standard of living. These percentages based on data from a 1977-1978 Los Angeles sample are substantially larger than those from other studies. I replicate...[this] analysis and demonstrate that the estimates reported in the book are inaccurate. This reanalysis...produces estimates of a 27 percent decline in womens standard of living and a 10 percent increase in mens after divorce. I discuss the implications of these results for debates about divorce law reform. (EXCERPT)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2096363

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Peterson, R. R.
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
1996-06
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
528
ISSN
0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056228507
Cited by
372
References
0
FWCI
25.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Re-Evaluation of the Economic Consequences of Divorce. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2096363
The paper
Peterson, R. R. (1996). A Re-Evaluation of the Economic Consequences of Divorce. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096363

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.