Cited by 206Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityNames, Identity, and Discrimination ResearchIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

Reconsidering the Declining Significance of Race: Racial Differences in Early Career Wages

Cancio, A. Silvia, Evans, T. David, Maume, David J.·1996·American Sociological Review

Abstract

A. Silvia Cancio, T. David Evans, David J. Maume, Jr., Reconsidering the Declining Significance of Race: Racial Differences in Early Career Wages, American Sociological Review, Vol. 61, No. 4 (Aug., 1996), pp. 541-556

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2096391

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 206

Authors
Cancio, A. S., Evans, T. D., & Maume, D. J.
Affiliations
University of Cincinnati (US)
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
1996-08
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
541
ISSN
0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2318713113
Cited by
206
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 20
FWCI
13.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
racial differences, racial wage gap, racial discrimination, wage inequality, young workers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review