The Programmatic Emergence of the Social Security State
Abstract
Les AA. examinent les programmes politiques en matiere de securite sociale lors de la formation des Etats-providence au tournant du siecle. Ils envisagent la strategie bismarkienne significative des etats de type «patriarcal» et qui repond aux mobilisations de masse de la classe ouvriere, puis une strategie d'incorporation des partis ou des syndicats ouvriers dans des coalitions liberales, enfin une strategie de reforme menee par les partis catholiques face a la mobilisation de la classe ouvriere. Ils montrent que cette mobilisation malgre une absence de participation politique a contribue au developpement des programmes sociaux entre 1880 et 1930
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Hicks, Misra, and Ng (1995), Pennings (2005), and Kittel, Obinger, and Wagschal (2000), it is unclear whether the endeavor is inductive or deductive.
“In all three cases, it is unclear whether the endeavor is inductive or deductive.”
From Qualitative Comparative Analysis: How Inductive Use and Measurement Error Lead to Problematic Inference (2013) · cites this paper as Hicks, Misra, and Ng (1995)
None of Hicks, Misra, and Ng (1995), Pennings (2005), or Kittel, Obinger, and Wagschal (2000) consider the possibility that their variables might be affected by measurement error.
“Also, none of these three sets of authors consider the possibility that the variables they use might be affected by measurement error.”
From Qualitative Comparative Analysis: How Inductive Use and Measurement Error Lead to Problematic Inference (2013) · cites this paper as Hicks, Misra, and Ng (1995)
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 43 · Cited by 131
- Authors
- Hicks, A., Misra, J., & Ng, T. N.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 329
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2312255482
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 22.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › French Historical and Cultural Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › European Political History Analysis
- Keywords
- social security, welfare state, Bismarckian welfare state, paternalism, working-class mobilization, trade unions, Catholic political parties, social programs, early 20th century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
