The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Social Movement Sympathizers Don't Participate: Erosion and Nonconversion of Support
Abstract
Social movement organizations face the challenge of converting action preparedness into action participation, and accordingly, they must deal with factors that lead to nonparticipation. We identify two routes to nonparticipationnonconversion and Nonconversion refers to a movement's failure to transform sympathizers into active participants. Erosion refers to the loss of sympathizers. We provide a theoretical framework for explaining nonconversion and erosion and apply it to a longitudinal study of a mobilization campaign of the Dutch Peace Movement: the People's Petition against cruise missiles. Data came from telephone interviews we conducted among random samples (N = 224) from the populations of four communities before and after the campaign (in May and November 1985). We use binomial logistic regression analyses to test several explanations of nonconversion and erosion. Factors that led to erosion were moderate action preparedness at the beginning of the campaign, declining preparedness during the campaign, and a social environment perceived by participants as becoming less and less supportive. Factors that led to nonconversion were moderate but stable action preparedness combined with the presence of barriers to action and an indifferent social environment. Results are discussed and related to social movement literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Rasch model for partial credit scoring
Masters, G. N. (1982) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02296272 · Cited by 3,782
Mobilization and Participation: Social-Psychological Expansisons of Resource Mobilization Theory
Klandermans, B. (1984) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095417 · Cited by 1,270
Self-citation
Cited by
van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504 · Cited by 2,714
A Social Psychology of Protest: Individuals in Action
van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, B. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316823354 · Cited by 1,016
Self-citationThe social psychology of protest
van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, B. (2013) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/0011392113479314 · Cited by 740
Self-citationEmbeddedness and Identity: How Immigrants Turn Grievances into Action
Klandermans, B., van der Toorn, J., & van Stekelenburg, J. (2008) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240807300606 · Cited by 425
Self-citationIdentity Politics and Politicized Identities: Identity Processes and the Dynamics of Protest
Klandermans, P. G. (2014) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12167 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Oegema, D., & Klandermans, B.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1994-10
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 703
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2313562017
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Social Movement Sympathizers Don't Participate: Erosion and Nonconversion of Support. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2096444
- The paper
- Oegema, D., & Klandermans, B. (1994). Why Social Movement Sympathizers Don't Participate: Erosion and Nonconversion of Support. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096444
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.