International Technology Transactions and the Theory of the Firm
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Empirical studies of technology transfer support the proposition that characteristics of knowledge determine the costs and mode of transfer.
“Empirical studies of technology transferclearly support the proposition that the characteristics of knowledge determinethe costs and mode of transfer.”
From Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation (1993) · cites this paper as Davidson and McFetridge [1984]
Davidson and McFetridge found that transfer to unaffiliated recipients is promoted if the firm has transferred technology in the past, while experience in internal transfers encourages more internal transfers in the future.
“Davidson and McFetridge [1984] similarly found that transferto unaffiliatedrecipients is promoted if the firm has transferred technology in the past.However, experience in internal transfers encourages more internal transfers in the future.”
From Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation (1993) · cites this paper as Davidson and McFetridge [1984]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 153
- Authors
- Davidson, W. H., & McFetridge, D. G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Industrial Economics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1984-03
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 253
- ISSN
- 0022-1821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064586977
- Cited by
- 153
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Industrial Economics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
- Keywords
- theory of the firm, technology transfer, firm boundaries, technology trade
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
