The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The climates of California according to the Köppen classification
Abstract
HE Geographical Review recently published a map by E. A. Ackerman showing the distribution of climates in North America according to the Koppen classification.' The small scale of this map necessitated considerable generalization in the mountainous West and along the Pacific Coast. A more detailed map of the distribution of climates in California is thus considered a desirable supplement. The presentation of a climatic map of California according to the Koppen system may seem superfluous in view of the fact that R. J. Russell published such a map fifteen years ago,2 which has been reproduced in part in this journal.3 Russell's map, however, was based on the old delimitation of dry climates (for regions with winter rains: N = t + 22, N being the annual precipitation in centimeters and t the mean annual temperature in degrees centigrade), which made steppe areas more extensive than the delimitation now in use (for regions with winter rains: N 2 t). Russell furthermore introduced a subclimate Cs'ab, transitional between the Csa and the Csb zones, which obliterates the boundary between these more commonly accepted climates and complicates the distributional pattern unduly. Thornthwaite4 has shown that the use of the formula N = t + II in place of the equation N = t/2 + II in the delimitation of the desert climate led to an exaggeration in the size of the desert areas on Russell's map.5 This mistake turns practically all of the San Joaquin Valley, with its vineyards and orchards o…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The clumped-isotope temperatures determined for hydrous magnesium carbonates corroborate the dependence on seasonality ( i.e. coupled temperature and water supply) in the formation of hydrous magnesium carbonates prevalent in the Mediterranean climate ( Csa , Ko ¨ppen climate classification system; Kesseli, 1942; Kauffman, 2003) of the California Coast Ranges.”
From Clumped-isotope thermometry of magnesium carbonates in ultramafic rocks (2016) · cites this paper as Kesseli, 1942
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Clumped-isotope thermometry of magnesium carbonates in ultramafic rocks
García del Real, P., Maher, K., Kluge, T., Bird, D. K., Brown, G. E., & John, C. M. (2016) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2016.08.003 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Kesseli, J. E.
- Corresponding author
- Kesseli, John E.
- Venue
- Geographical Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1942-07
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 476
- ISSN
- 0016-7428 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2316712754
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Geographical Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Geography and Environmental Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental and biological studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Keywords
- Köppen climate classification, climate mapping, California climate, Thornthwaite method, San Joaquin Valley, semi-arid climate, arid climate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review