Why does Jane read and write so well? the anomaly of women's achievement
Abstract
Numerous studies have found that women's academic achievement not only equals but often surpasses that of men. In this society, in which educational credentials are linked to jobs, promotions, wages, and status, women's educational accomplishments appear anomalous because women continue to receive far fewer rewards for their educational credentials than do men with comparable credentials. In view of the limited rewards that women are likely to receive for education, why do they do as well and attain as much education as they do? This article examines the anomaly of women's achievement in light of four hypotheses and presents empirical evidence to assess each hypothesis. Attention is paid throughout to racial and class differences in women's lived experiences in the opportunity structure. Finally, directions for future research are suggested. The evidence is in and the conclusion is clear: Women can and do achieve academically as well as do men. The myth of female underachievement has been exposed by many studies that have indicated that women's motivation and behavior to achieve not only equal but often surpass that of men (Klein 1985; Maccoby and Jacklin 1974; National Center for Educational Statistics 1986; Stockard 1985; Stockard and Wood 1984; U.S. Bureau of the Census 1987). Today, as in the past, more girls than boys graduate from high school and more women than men receive baccalaureate degrees,' and nationwide, women now outnumber men in master's degree programs. More…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Girls are often rated to be more dutiful and cooperative in classes than boys.
“Further, girls are often rated to be more dutiful and cooperative in classes than boys (Mickelson, 1989).”
From Gender and Education (2015) · cites this paper as Mickelson, 1989
Girls have consistently outperformed boys in classroom academic performance throughout much of the developed world since at least the mid-1900s.
“Considering children ' s academic performance in the classroom as opposed to performance on standardized exams, girls have consistently outperformed boys throughout much of the developed world since at least the mid-1900s (Mickelson, 1989).”
From Gender and Education (2015) · cites this paper as Mickelson, 1989
Cites
Black students' school success: Coping with the ?burden of ?acting white??
Fordham, S., & Ogbu, J. U. (1986) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf01112192 · Cited by 3,323 · see citing works
Anderson, K., & Davis, A. Y. (1982) · The Journal of American History · doi:10.2307/1903191 · Cited by 1,087 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gender, Self-Perception, and Academic Problems in High School
Crosnoe, R., Riegle-Crumb, C., & Muller, C. (2007) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.2007.54.1.118 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Pahlke, E., & Goble, P. (2015) · International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.92151-2 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mickelson, R. A.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mickelson, Roslyn Arlin
- Venue
- Sociology of Education
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1989-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47
- ISSN
- 0038-0407 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023573963
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 2.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sociology of Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Keywords
- gender gap in education, educational credentials, returns to education, opportunity structures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review