Cited by 63Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationMedia Studies and CommunicationGender Politics and Representation

House Members' Communication Styles: Newsletters and Press Releases

Yiannakis, Diana Evans·1982·The Journal of Politics

Abstract

The literature on Congress offers no systematic analysis of representatives' communications with their constituents. This paper argues that such communications constitute an important linkage between representative and represented and, as such, are indicators of House members' interelection reelection strategies. Mayhew's categories of member activities were used for classifying communication styles in House members' newsletters and press releases; however, in order to delineate styles which discriminate among members in different electoral circumstances, it proved necessary to modify those categories to include consideration of geographic focus. The distinction between nationally oriented and locally oriented position taking was found to be particularly important. Thus, communication style was found to be a function of district and member characteristics; more ideologically extreme members from affluent suburban districts emphasize position taking on national issues; while relatively senior members from poor districts tend to present a particularized credit-claiming style.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2130673

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Grimmer (2012) shows that the spectrum of expressed priorities approximates spectra suggested in earlier qualitative work and predicted in formal theoretic models of Congress and Congressional elections.

    “Grimmer (2012) shows that this spectrum is theoretically interesting: it approximates spectra suggested in earlier qualitative work (Fenno 1978;Yiannakis 1982), and predicted in formal theoretic models of Congress and Congressional elections (Weingast, Shepsle, and Johnsen 1981;Ashworth and Bueno de Mesquita 2006).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 24 · Cited by 63

Authors
Yiannakis, D. E.
Corresponding author
Yiannakis, Diana Evans
Venue
The Journal of Politics
Published
1982-11
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
1049-1071
ISSN
  • 0022-3816 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2508
OpenAlex
W2039047078
Cited by
63
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
11.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Politics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Politics and Representation
Keywords
congressional communication, House members, press releases, constituent relations, position-taking, district characteristics, ideological extremity, suburban districts, credit claiming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review