The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A New Model for Old Measures: A Covariance Structure Analysis of Political Efficacy
Abstract
Political efficacy is a key concept in theories of political participation and democratic governance. This paper uses covariance structure analytic techniques to assess the adequacy of traditional SRC indicators for measuring political efficacy in the United States and other liberal democracies. Analyses indicate that a two-factor model of a subset of these indicators fits data for the U.S. and six other countries very well, with item loadings corresponding to prevailing conceptual distinctions between internal and external efficacy. In the American case the structure of the model is invariant by race, gender and political context, and the relative strength of correlations between the efficacy factors and measures of personal competence and perceived government responsiveness agrees with theoretical expectations. Although the SRC items appear to be useful measures of efficacy, simple equally weighted additive indices such as those utilized by the SRC itself are inadequate. More sophisticated measurement models are required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theory and Procedure of Scale Analysis: With Applications in Political Research
Mokken, R. J. (1971) · doi:10.1515/9783110813203 · Cited by 1,120
Cited by
Measuring Internal Political Efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study
Niemi, R. G., Craig, S. C., & Mattei, F. (1991) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1963953 · Cited by 1,072
Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items
Craig, S. C., Niemi, R. G., & Silver, G. E. (1990) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf00992337 · Cited by 983
National Elections and Political Attitudes: The Case of Political Efficacy
Clarke, H. D., & Acock, A. C. (1989) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123400005639 · Cited by 344
Self-citationIndustrial Work and Political Participation: Beyond "Simple Spillover"
Greenberg, E. S., Grunberg, L., & Daniel, K. (1996) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/106591299604900204 · Cited by 92
Chan, R. C. H., Mak, W. W. S., Chan, W.-Y., & Lin, W.-Y. (2021) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-020-00303-y · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Acock, A., Clarke, H. D., & Stewart, M. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Politics
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1985-11
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1062-1084
- ISSN
- 0022-3816 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2508
- OpenAlex
- W2072776441
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New Model for Old Measures: A Covariance Structure Analysis of Political Efficacy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2130807
- The paper
- Acock, A., Clarke, H. D., & Stewart, M. C. (1985). A New Model for Old Measures: A Covariance Structure Analysis of Political Efficacy. The Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2130807
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.