Physicians’ communication style and patient satisfaction
Abstract
Research has linked the communication styles of physicians to patients' satisfaction with health care. Recently Ben-Sira (1976, 1980) offered a social interaction model to explain this relationship; this model, however, focused on a single, narrow style of communicating and overlooked the broader spectrum of styles. This survey assessed two general communication styles: affiliation and control. It also examined eight social characteristics of medical interviews as possible mediators of the impact of the physician's communication style on the patient's satisfaction. Patients' evaluations of the physician's communication were associated strongly with patients' evaluations of medical care, suggesting that competence in communication may be a facet of medical competence. Affiliative styles were related positively to patients' satisfaction, whereas dominant/active styles had a negative relationship with satisfaction. Severity of the illness, physician's age, physician's specialty, and the number of prior visits affected the importance of the physician's communication in the patient's evaluations of care.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both verbal and non-verbal behaviour of physicians during consultation seem to correlate positively with patient satisfaction.
“When looking at the impact of components of physicians' behaviour during consultation, both verbal behaviour and non-verbal behaviour seem to correlate positively with patient satisfaction.(13,14,15,16)”
From Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor–patient communication: does it make a difference? (2005) · cites this paper as [16]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 492
- Authors
- Buller, M. K., & Buller, D. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Health and Social Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1987-12
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 375
- ISSN
- 0022-1465 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970512280
- Cited by
- 492
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 26.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Health and Social Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
- Keywords
- physician-patient communication, communication styles, patient satisfaction, control style, social interaction models, medical interview, physician competence, disease severity, physician age, physician specialty
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Communication, Consumer Behavior, Humans, Physician-Patient Relations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review