Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Gender Inequality and Fertility in Two Nepali Villages

Morgan, S. Philip, Niraula, Bhanu B.·1995·Population and Development Review

Abstract

This study supports the authors argument that greater autonomy for women lowers fertility by reducing the desire for more children increasing contraceptive use and lowering the level of unmet need for contraception. Social context in general and gender inequality in particular are important determinants of fertility behavior. The theoretical strategy relies on the quasi-anthropological approach of Smith (1989). Surveys were conducted in two villages in Nepal Bagahi and Benighat both patriarchal but only the former practicing purdah (the seclusion of women). The research strategy controlled for demographic and socioeconomic setting in order to demonstrate the importance of different cultural and institutional contexts. The two settings reflect the more flexible social traditions of Hinduism (Benighat) which was influenced historically by Tibetan Buddhism and the more rigid Hinduism of the plains (Bagahi) which was influenced by Islam. The caste system is more rigid and more complex in Bagahi. In Benighat women have more freedom to visit a neighboring village involvement in household decision making and control of income. Surveys were conducted in early 1993 and supplemented with in-depth case studies interviews and observations. Survey responses were consistent with expectations. 31% of women in Benighat and 42% in Bagahi intended to have additional children. 40% in Benighat and 24% in Bagahi used contraception. 59% in Bagahi and 45% in Benighat intended no additional children and were not currently using contraception (unmet need). Findings indicate a stronger son preference in Bagahi and greater likelihood of contraceptive use among women with at least two sons. Women in Benighat who desired no more children were 1.8 times more likely to use contraception and on the four point autonomy scale for every higher stage the odds of contraceptive use increased by a factor of 1.29. The net effects of the setting reduced use by a factor of 0.83 to 1.5 times and the net effect of a step on the autonomy scale was reduced by a factor of 0.89 to 1.15 times.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2137749

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Morgan, S. P., & Niraula, B. B.
Venue
Population and Development Review
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1995-09
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
541
ISSN
0098-7921 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018539648
Cited by
223
References
0
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender Inequality and Fertility in Two Nepali Villages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2137749
The paper
Morgan, S. P., & Niraula, B. B. (1995). Gender Inequality and Fertility in Two Nepali Villages. Population and Development Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137749

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.