The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gender Inequality and Fertility in Two Nepali Villages
Abstract
This study supports the authors argument that greater autonomy for women lowers fertility by reducing the desire for more children increasing contraceptive use and lowering the level of unmet need for contraception. Social context in general and gender inequality in particular are important determinants of fertility behavior. The theoretical strategy relies on the quasi-anthropological approach of Smith (1989). Surveys were conducted in two villages in Nepal Bagahi and Benighat both patriarchal but only the former practicing purdah (the seclusion of women). The research strategy controlled for demographic and socioeconomic setting in order to demonstrate the importance of different cultural and institutional contexts. The two settings reflect the more flexible social traditions of Hinduism (Benighat) which was influenced historically by Tibetan Buddhism and the more rigid Hinduism of the plains (Bagahi) which was influenced by Islam. The caste system is more rigid and more complex in Bagahi. In Benighat women have more freedom to visit a neighboring village involvement in household decision making and control of income. Surveys were conducted in early 1993 and supplemented with in-depth case studies interviews and observations. Survey responses were consistent with expectations. 31% of women in Benighat and 42% in Bagahi intended to have additional children. 40% in Benighat and 24% in Bagahi used contraception. 59% in Bagahi and 45% in Benighat intended no additional children and were not currently using contraception (unmet need). Findings indicate a stronger son preference in Bagahi and greater likelihood of contraceptive use among women with at least two sons. Women in Benighat who desired no more children were 1.8 times more likely to use contraception and on the four point autonomy scale for every higher stage the odds of contraceptive use increased by a factor of 1.29. The net effects of the setting reduced use by a factor of 0.83 to 1.5 times and the net effect of a step on the autonomy scale was reduced by a factor of 0.89 to 1.15 times.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment.
Kabeer, N. (1999) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/1467-7660.00125 · Cited by 4,976
Do Women’s Land Rights Promote Empowerment and Child Health in Nepal?
Allendorf, K. (2007) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.12.005 · Cited by 531
Schuler, S. R., Hashemi, S. M., & Riley, A. P. (1997) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(96)00119-2 · Cited by 300
Mixed method data collection strategies
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-6909 · Cited by 278
Women's autonomy and its impact on fertility
Abadian, S. (1996) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(96)00075-7 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Morgan, S. P., & Niraula, B. B.
- Venue
- Population and Development Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1995-09
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 541
- ISSN
- 0098-7921 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018539648
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender Inequality and Fertility in Two Nepali Villages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2137749
- The paper
- Morgan, S. P., & Niraula, B. B. (1995). Gender Inequality and Fertility in Two Nepali Villages. Population and Development Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137749
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.