The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Couples and Reproductive Health: A Review of Couple Studies
Abstract
Traditionally, fertility and family planning research and programs have focused on women. With the expansion of the field to include reproductive health following the 1994 International Conference on Population in Cairo, the more appropriate focus for most reproductive health components appears to be the sexually active couple. This review of studies of couples and reproductive health outcomes examines reports of objective reproductive events, of attitudes and reproductive intentions, of the effect of each partner's attitudes and intentions, of reproductive outcomes, and of the effectiveness of interventions that target couples compared with those that target one partner or the other. For couples' statements about reproductive events, studies throughout the world typically show identical reports less than 90 percent of the time. Concordance between partners on subjective matters is in the range of 60 to 70 percent. Data based on reports of reproductive intentions from both partners have been shown to lead to better predictions of behavior than have data from only one partner. Finally, reproductive health interventions that target couples are found to be more effective than those directed to only one sex. The evidence clearly justifies a focus on couples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sexual Decision-Making and AIDS: Why Condom Promotion among Vulnerable Women is Likely to Fail
Worth, D. (1989) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.2307/1966433 · Cited by 395
Cited by
Blanc, A. K. (2001) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2001.00189.x · Cited by 610
Absent and Problematic Men: Demographic Accounts of Male Reproductive Roles
Greene, M. E., & Biddlecom, A. E. (2000) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00081.x · Cited by 447
Bargaining Power Within Couples and Use of Prenatal and Delivery Care in Indonesia
Beegle, K., Frankenberg, E., & Thomas, D. (2001) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2001.00130.x · Cited by 400
How Gender Roles Influence Sexual and Reproductive Health Among South African Adolescents
Varga, C. A. (2003) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2003.00160.x · Cited by 368
Shattuck, D., Kerner, B., Gilles, K., Hartmann, M., Ng'ombe, T., & Guest, G. (2011) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2010.300091 · Cited by 335
Metadata
- Authors
- Becker, S.
- Venue
- Studies in Family Planning
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 291
- ISSN
- 0039-3665 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2076416950
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Couples and Reproductive Health: A Review of Couple Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2138025
- The paper
- Becker, S. (1996). Couples and Reproductive Health: A Review of Couple Studies. Studies in Family Planning. https://doi.org/10.2307/2138025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.