The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biological Relationships between Africa and South America
Abstract
Examines the separation and subsequent history of Africa and South America from a biological point of view. The book provides an up-to-date comparative view of their flora and fauna, and summarizes current knowledge about the biogeographical relationships among major groups of organisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The resurrection of oceanic dispersal in historical biogeography
QUEIROZ, A. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.11.006 · Cited by 692
Mas‐Coma, S., Valero, M. A., & Bargues, M. D. (2009) · Advances in Parasitology · doi:10.1016/s0065-308x(09)69002-3 · Cited by 678
Global patterns of diversification in the history of modern amphibians
Roelants, K., Gower, D. J., Wilkinson, M., Loader, S. P., Biju, S. D., Guillaume, K., Moriau, L., & Bossuyt, F. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0608378104 · Cited by 639
Givnish, T. J., Barfuss, M. H. J., Van Ee, B., Riina, R., Schulte, K., Horres, R., Gonsiska, P. A., Jabaily, R. S., Crayn, D. M., Smith, J. A. C., et al. (2011) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.1000059 · Cited by 507
Tropical Forest Biodiversity: Distributional Patterns and Their Conservational Significance
Gentry, A. H. (1992) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3545512 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Voeks, R. A., & Goldblatt, P.
- Venue
- Geographical Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 115
- ISSN
- 0016-7428 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1663400196
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological Relationships between Africa and South America. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/215565
- The paper
- Voeks, R. A., & Goldblatt, P. (1995). Biological Relationships between Africa and South America. Geographical Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/215565
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
