Cited by 284Energy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesEconomic and Environmental ValuationEconomics of Agriculture and Food Markets

Nonparametric Estimation of Exact Consumers Surplus and Deadweight Loss

Hausman, Jerry A., Newey, Whitney K.·1995·Econometrica

Abstract

We apply nonparametric regression models to estimation of demand curves of the type most often used in applied research.From the demand curve estimators we derive estimates of exact consumers surplus and deadweight loss, that are the most widely used welfare and economic efficiency measures in areas of economics such as public finance.We also develop tests of the symmetry and downward sloping properties of compensated demand.We work out asymptotic normal sampling theory for kernel and series nonparametric estimators, as well as for the parametric case.The paper includes an application to gasoline demand.Empirical questions of interest here are the shape of the demand curve and the average magnitude of welfare loss from a tax on gasoline.In this application we compare parametric and nonparametric estimates of the demand curve, calculate exact and approximate measures of consumers surplus and deadweight loss, and give standard error estimates.We also analyze the sensitivity of the welfare measures to components of nonparametric regression estimators such as the number of terms in a series approximation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2171777

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The estimate of Hausman and Newey (1995) suggests a bound of -0.8 ≤ Use_t ≤ 0.

    “Their estimate suggests a bound of À0:8≤ Use t ≤0.”

    From THE ROLE OF INVENTORIES AND SPECULATIVE TRADING IN THE GLOBAL MARKET FOR CRUDE OIL (2014) · cites this paper as Hausman and Newey (1995)

  • A benchmark for the long-run price elasticity of oil demand is provided by studies of nonparametric gasoline demand functions based on US household survey data such as Hausman and Newey (1995), which have consistently produced long-run price elasticity estimates near -0.8.

    “A benchmark for that long-run elasticity is provided by studies of nonparametric gasoline demand functions based on US household survey data such as Hausman and Newey (1995), which have consistently produced long-run price elasticity estimates near À0.8.”

    From THE ROLE OF INVENTORIES AND SPECULATIVE TRADING IN THE GLOBAL MARKET FOR CRUDE OIL (2014) · cites this paper as Hausman and Newey (1995)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hausman, J. A., & Newey, W. K.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Econometrica
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1995-11
Volume
63
Issue
6
Pages
1445
ISSN
0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973657519
Cited by
284
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Econometrica (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
Keywords
consumer surplus, deadweight loss, demand curve estimation, nonparametric regression, kernel density estimation, asymptotic normality, gasoline consumption, gasoline tax, welfare measurement, parametric vs nonparametric comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review