Nonparametric Estimation of Exact Consumers Surplus and Deadweight Loss
Abstract
We apply nonparametric regression models to estimation of demand curves of the type most often used in applied research.From the demand curve estimators we derive estimates of exact consumers surplus and deadweight loss, that are the most widely used welfare and economic efficiency measures in areas of economics such as public finance.We also develop tests of the symmetry and downward sloping properties of compensated demand.We work out asymptotic normal sampling theory for kernel and series nonparametric estimators, as well as for the parametric case.The paper includes an application to gasoline demand.Empirical questions of interest here are the shape of the demand curve and the average magnitude of welfare loss from a tax on gasoline.In this application we compare parametric and nonparametric estimates of the demand curve, calculate exact and approximate measures of consumers surplus and deadweight loss, and give standard error estimates.We also analyze the sensitivity of the welfare measures to components of nonparametric regression estimators such as the number of terms in a series approximation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The estimate of Hausman and Newey (1995) suggests a bound of -0.8 ≤ Use_t ≤ 0.
“Their estimate suggests a bound of À0:8≤ Use t ≤0.”
From THE ROLE OF INVENTORIES AND SPECULATIVE TRADING IN THE GLOBAL MARKET FOR CRUDE OIL (2014) · cites this paper as Hausman and Newey (1995)
A benchmark for the long-run price elasticity of oil demand is provided by studies of nonparametric gasoline demand functions based on US household survey data such as Hausman and Newey (1995), which have consistently produced long-run price elasticity estimates near -0.8.
“A benchmark for that long-run elasticity is provided by studies of nonparametric gasoline demand functions based on US household survey data such as Hausman and Newey (1995), which have consistently produced long-run price elasticity estimates near À0.8.”
From THE ROLE OF INVENTORIES AND SPECULATIVE TRADING IN THE GLOBAL MARKET FOR CRUDE OIL (2014) · cites this paper as Hausman and Newey (1995)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
THE ROLE OF INVENTORIES AND SPECULATIVE TRADING IN THE GLOBAL MARKET FOR CRUDE OIL
Kilian, L., & Murphy, D. P. (2014) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.2322 · Cited by 1,481 · see citing works
Debiased machine learning of conditional average treatment effects and other causal functions
Semenova, V., & Chernozhukov, V. (2021) · The Econometrics Journal · doi:10.1093/ectj/utaa027 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hausman, J. A., & Newey, W. K.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1445
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973657519
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 6.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Econometrica (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
- Keywords
- consumer surplus, deadweight loss, demand curve estimation, nonparametric regression, kernel density estimation, asymptotic normality, gasoline consumption, gasoline tax, welfare measurement, parametric vs nonparametric comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review