The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Word Meaning and Montague Grammar.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T. (2003) · International Journal of Corpus Linguistics · doi:10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste · Cited by 1,492
Distributional Memory: A General Framework for Corpus-Based Semantics
Baroni, M., & Lenci, A. (2010) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00016 · Cited by 659
On the Semantic Content of the Notion of ‘Thematic Role’
Dowty, D. R. (1989) · Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2723-0_3 · Cited by 608
Self-citationHoekstra, T. (1988) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/0024-3841(88)90056-3 · Cited by 444
Miller, G. A., & Fellbaum, C. (1991) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(91)90036-4 · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Parsons, T., & Dowty, D. R.
- Venue
- The Philosophical Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1982-04
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 290
- ISSN
- 0031-8108 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025589690
- Cited by
- 1,805
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 148.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2184639
- The paper
- Parsons, T., & Dowty, D. R. (1982). Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. The Philosophical Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184639
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
