The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Neutrality During the European Wars of 1792–1815: America's Understanding of Her Obligations
Abstract
The year 1792 marks the beginning of the long European struggle which started as the French Revolution and culminated in the Napoleonic Wars. The first notice that a state of war existed reached the Government of the United States August 2, 1792, when the French Minister at Philadelphia, M. Jean Temant, informed Thomas Jefferson, the American Secretary of State, that the French Government had declared war against Hungary and Bohemia. The Secretary of State, in reply to this notice, assured the French Minister that the United States would remain friendly to France “and render all those good offices which shall be consistent with the duties of a neutral nation.” This expression of Mr. Jefferson seems to be the only direct acknowledgement by President Washington or his Cabinet that the United States had been placed in the position of a neutral state.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Second the principles of neutrality were usually interpreted to require states themselves (but not private citizens) to refrain from supplying arms to belligerents (Hyneman 1930; McLaughlin 1938).”
From Race, Sovereignty, and Free Trade: Arms Trade Regulation and Humanitarian Arms Control in the Age of Empire (2018) · cites this paper as Hyneman 1930
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Turner, 1903, Report Am. Historical Assoc., II, 216
- Turner, 1903, Report Am. Historical Assoc., II, 246
- Turner, 1903, Report Am. Historical Assoc., II, 684
- Martens, 1817–35, Recueil de traités condus par les puissances de l’Europe, I, 41
- Turner, 1897, Report Am. Historical Assoc., 603
- Turner, 1897, American Historical Association, Annual Reports, 576
- Turner, 1903, Report Am. Historical Assoc., II, 287
- Turner, 1903, Report Am. Historical Assoc., II, 719
- Martens, Recueil de traités, V, 401
- Turner, 1903, Report Am. Historical Assoc., II, 345
- Hall, 1924, A Treatise on International Law, 695
- Martens, 1788, Précis du droit des gens modeme de I’Europe, II, 301
- Turner, 1903, American Historical Association, Annual Report, II, 221
- Wharton, 1849, State Trials of the United States during the Administrations of Washington and Adams, 64
- Bee, 1795, Moodie v. The Betty Cathcart, 742
- Hildreth, 1874, The History of the People of the United States of America from 1788 to 1821, I, 653
- Turner, 1903, Report Am. Historical Assoc., II, 196
- Conway, 1889, Omitted Chapters of History Disclosed in the Life and Papers of Edmund Randolph, 183
- Channing, 1905-25, A History of the United States, IV, 133, 10.5479/sil.257713.39088006584726 · DOI
- Minnigerode, 1793, Friend of France, 208
- Turner, 1903, Report Am. Historical Assoc., II, 253
- Redslob, 1923, Histoire des grands principes du droit des gens, 244
- Phillimore, 1879-89, Commentaries upon International Law, III, 242
Cited by
Cooper, N. (2018) · Journal of Global Security Studies · doi:10.1093/jogss/ogy013 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Hyneman, C. S.
- Affiliations
- Syracuse University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hyneman, Charles S.
- Venue
- American Journal of International Law
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1930-04
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 279-309
- ISSN
- 0002-9300 (ISSN-L)
- 2161-7953
- OpenAlex
- W2319065151
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of International Law (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › American Constitutional Law and Politics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › History and International Relations
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Historical Influence and Diplomacy
- Keywords
- American neutrality, French Revolutionary Wars, Napoleonic Wars, US foreign policy, Thomas Jefferson, state of war
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neutrality During the European Wars of 1792–1815: America's Understanding of Her Obligations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2189404
- The paper
- Hyneman, C. S. (1930). Neutrality During the European Wars of 1792–1815: America's Understanding of Her Obligations. American Journal of International Law. https://doi.org/10.2307/2189404