The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Human Dignity as a Normative Concept
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although rarely defined in legal documents (Schachter 1983, 849), the concept of dignity proves foundational to the possibility of liberal jurisprudence and international human rights law (Rosen 2012).”
From Exhuming Dead Persons: Forensic Science and the Making of Post-fascist Publics in Spain (2020) · cites this paper as Schachter 1983, 849
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Benda, 1983, Die Menschenwürde,, Handbuch des Verfassungsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 107
Cited by
Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly
Sharkey, A., & Sharkey, N. (2012) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-010-9234-6 · Cited by 985
Waldron, J. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199915439.001.0001 · Cited by 687
Exhuming Dead Persons: Forensic Science and the Making of Post-fascist Publics in Spain
Rubin, J. S. (2020) · Cultural Anthropology · doi:10.14506/ca35.3.01 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Schachter, O.
- Venue
- American Journal of International Law
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1983-10
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 848-854
- ISSN
- 0002-9300
- 2161-7953
- Cited by
- 157
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human Dignity as a Normative Concept. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2202536
- The paper
- Schachter, O. (1983). Human Dignity as a Normative Concept. American Journal of International Law. https://doi.org/10.2307/2202536
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
