The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Origins of the Civil Rights Movement: Black Communities Organizing for Change.
Abstract
This important and provocative book reflects a trend in recent scholarship concerning the modern struggles for black advancement. Scholars have increasingly moved from a national to a local perspective in their effort to understand the momentous changes in American racial relations since 1954. The newer scholarship has begun to examine the distinctive qualities of the local black movements that both grew out of and spurred the campaign for national civil rights laws. Earlier studies have told us much about nationally prominent civil rights leaders such as King, but only recently have scholars begun to portray the southern black struggle as a locally based social movement with its own objectives instead of merely as a source of mass enthusiasm to be mobilized and manipulated by the national leaders. In short, what has been called the civil rights movement is now understood as more than an effort to achieve civil rights reforms. Revisionist scholarship such as Morris's has challenged many widely held assumptions regarding black activism of the 1950's and 1960's. In the 1960's, black activism was usually categorized with other forms of collective behavior, which were seen as ephemeral outbursts of emotions. In this view, protest activity was an expression of the yearning of blacks to realize a longstanding civil rights reform agenda and thereby become part of the American mainstream. While recognizing that black protesters were impatient with the pace of racial change and with the caution of NAACP leaders, scholars nevertheless assumed that the political significance of mass militancy was limited. Mass militancy merely gauged integrationist sentiments among blacks and allowed national civil rights leaders to demonstrate the urgency of their concerns. Only such leaders, it was assumed, possessed the political sophistication and access to institutionalized power that was necessary to transform amorphous racial frustrations and resentments into an effective force for social reform. Most early studies of the civil rights movement gave little at-
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rethinking Racism: Toward a Structural Interpretation
Bonilla-Silva, E. (1997) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657316 · Cited by 2,760
Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador
Wood, E. J. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808685 · Cited by 1,644
Social Movement Continuity: The Women's Movement in Abeyance
Taylor, V. (1989) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2117752 · Cited by 1,388
Social Capital and Democracy: An Interdependent Relationship
Paxton, P. (2002) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240206700205 · Cited by 1,080
Prime Suspects: The Influence of Local Television News on the Viewing Public
Gilliam, F. D., & Iyengar, S. (2000) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2669264 · Cited by 962
Metadata
- Authors
- Hine, D. C., & Morris, A. D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Southern History
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1985-11
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 652
- ISSN
- 0022-4642 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1536462022
- Cited by
- 1,880
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Origins of the Civil Rights Movement: Black Communities Organizing for Change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2209556
- The paper
- Hine, D. C., & Morris, A. D. (1985). The Origins of the Civil Rights Movement: Black Communities Organizing for Change. The Journal of Southern History. https://doi.org/10.2307/2209556
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.