The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Divine Simplicity
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Once it is introduced, however, his interpretation no longer seems objectionable.”
From Making Sense of Divine Simplicity (2008) · cites this paper as Wolterstorff 1991
In the citing paper
“Wolterstorff 's diagnosis of contemporary diffi culties with simplicity seems plausible in light of our earlier discussion.”
From Making Sense of Divine Simplicity (2008) · cites this paper as Wolterstorff 1991
In the citing paper
“Evidently, therefore, in order to remove the incompleteness associated with Wolterstorff 's constituent account, we must revise CA along the following lines:”
From Making Sense of Divine Simplicity (2008) · cites this paper as Wolterstorff 1991
In the citing paper
“Moreover, his suggestion that the medievals interpret the doctrine in terms of CA (rather than PA) seems promising.”
From Making Sense of Divine Simplicity (2008) · cites this paper as Wolterstorff 1991
In the citing paper
“Even so, it seems to me that there is a respect in which the theory of predication and abstract reference underlying it is unacceptably incomplete.”
From Making Sense of Divine Simplicity (2008) · cites this paper as Wolterstorff 1991
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Making Sense of Divine Simplicity
Brower, J. E., & The Society of Christian Philosophers (2008) · Faith and Philosophy · doi:10.5840/faithphil20082511 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolterstorff, N.
- Corresponding author
- Wolterstorff, Nicholas
- Venue
- Philosophical Perspectives
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1991
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 531
- ISSN
- 1520-8583 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4248179425
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 19 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Philosophical Perspectives (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Medieval Philosophy and Theology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Karl Barth and Christian Theology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Keywords
- divine simplicity, divine attributes, divine nature
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Divine Simplicity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2214108
- The paper
- Wolterstorff, N. (1991). Divine Simplicity. Philosophical Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214108
