The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Moral Theory and Medical Practice.
Abstract
Critique de l'ouvrage de K.W.M.Fulford (1989) portant sur l'un des liens les plus significatifs entre la philosophie et la psychiatrie, la maniere dont la theorie morale est reliee a la pratique medicale.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
What is a mental/psychiatric disorder? From DSM-IV to DSM-V
Stein, D. J., Phillips, K. A., Bolton, D., Fulford, K. W. M., Sadler, J. Z., & Kendler, K. S. (2010) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291709992261 · Cited by 477
Self-citationPsychiatric disorders: a conceptual taxonomy
Zachar, P., & Kendler, K. S. (2007) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.2007.164.4.557 · Cited by 236
Geographical variation in dementia: Systematic review with meta-analysis
Russ, T. C., Batty, G. D., Hearnshaw, G. F., Fenton, C., & Starr, J. M. (2012) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dys103 · Cited by 191
(1994) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 77
Psychopathological symptoms and religious experience: a critique of Jackson and Fulford.
Marzanski, M., & Bratton, M. (2002) · Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology · doi:10.1353/ppp.2003.0062 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Spitzer, M., & Fulford, K. W. M.
- Venue
- Noûs
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1993-09
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 401
- ISSN
- 0029-4624 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066575487
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Moral Theory and Medical Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2215948
- The paper
- Spitzer, M., & Fulford, K. W. M. (1993). Moral Theory and Medical Practice. Noûs. https://doi.org/10.2307/2215948
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
