The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow
Abstract
The catalytic shock of the end of the Cold War and the apparent inability of international relations (IR) theory to predict this profound change have raised questions about how we should go about understanding the world of today. Our inherited tools and ways of describing the international arena seem not to work as well as they once did. To explain and predict the behavior of the human collectivities comprising nation-states, IR theory requires a theory of human political choice. Within the study of IR, foreign policy analysis (FPA) has begun to develop such a theoretical perspective. From its inception, FPA has involved the examination of how foreign policy decisions are made and has assumed that human beings, acting individually or in collectivities, are the source of much behavior and most change in international politics. This article reviews the field of foreign policy analysis, examining its research core and its evolution to date. The overview also looks forward, pointing to the future, not only of FPA itself, but to the implications that future developments in FPA may have for the study of international relations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games
Putnam, R. D. (1988) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300027697 · Cited by 7,475
The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations
Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963) · Cited by 4,055
Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis
Holsti, O. R., & Allison, G. T. (1972) · The Western Political Quarterly · doi:10.2307/446741 · Cited by 3,658
Perception and Misperception in International Politics
Jervis, R. (2017) · doi:10.1515/9781400885114 · Cited by 3,199
Janis, I. L. (1972) · Cited by 2,382
Walt, S. M. (2019) · Cornell University Press eBooks · doi:10.7591/9780801469992 · Cited by 1,535
Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986
Maoz, Z., & Russett, B. (1993) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2938740 · Cited by 1,524
6 SMALL STATES IN WORLD MARKETS Industrial Policy in Europe
Katzenstein, P. J. (2012) · Small States in International Relations · doi:10.1515/9780295802107-007 · Cited by 1,419
War, Presidents and Public Opinion
(2017) · The SHAFR Guide Online · doi:10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim170220024 · Cited by 1,416
Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science
Simon, H. A. (1985) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1956650 · Cited by 1,359
Cited by
Political Parties and Foreign Aid
Thérien, J.-P., & Noël, A. (2000) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2586386 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Hudson, V. M., & Vore, C. S.
- Venue
- Mershon International Studies Review
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209
- ISSN
- 1079-1760 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2315751640
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 88
- FWCI
- 16.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/222751
- The paper
- Hudson, V. M., & Vore, C. S. (1995). Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Mershon International Studies Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/222751
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.