The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the Measurement of Technological Change
Abstract
Journal Article On the Measurement of Technological Change Get access Evsey D. Domar Evsey D. Domar Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 39. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Economic Journal, Volume 71, Issue 284, 1 December 1961, Pages 709–729, https://doi.org/10.2307/2228246 Published: 01 December 1961
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Technology, Geography, and Trade
Eaton, J., & Kortum, S. (2002) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00352 · Cited by 4,485
The Resurgence of Growth in the Late 1990s: Is Information Technology the Story?
Oliner, S. D., & Sichel, D. E. (2000) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.14.4.3 · Cited by 1,845
Raising the Speed Limit: U.S. Economic Growth in the Information Age
Jorgenson, D. W., & Stiroh, K. J. (2000) · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity · doi:10.1353/eca.2000.0008 · Cited by 1,462
Information Technology and the U.S. Economy
Jorgenson, D. W. (2001) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.91.1.1 · Cited by 1,295
Alcott, B. (2005) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.020 · Cited by 859
Processing Trade, Tariff Reductions and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Chinese Firms
Yu, M. (2015) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12127 · Cited by 837
Information Technology and the U.S. Productivity Revival: What Do the Industry Data Say?
Stiroh, K. J. (2002) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282802762024638 · Cited by 784
“Productivity and Misallocation in General Equilibrium”
Baqaee, D. R., & Farhi, E. (2020) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjz030 · Cited by 648
The Granular Origins of Aggregate Fluctuations
Gabaix, X. (2009) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w15286 · Cited by 494
Trade and the Global Recession
Eaton, J., Kortum, S., Neiman, B., & Romalis, J. (2016) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20101557 · Cited by 413
Challenges to Mismeasurement Explanations for the US Productivity Slowdown
Syverson, C. (2017) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.165 · Cited by 302
Measuring aggregate productivity growth using plant‐level data
Petrin, A., & Levinsohn, J. (2012) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.1111/1756-2171.12005 · Cited by 278
Information Technology and Productivity: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going?
Sichel, D. E., & Oliner, S. D. (2002) · Finance and Economics Discussion Series · doi:10.17016/feds.2002.29 · Cited by 258
The impact of information technology on postwar US economic growth
Jorgenson, D. W., Ho, M. S., & Samuels, J. D. (2016) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2015.03.001 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Domar, E. D.
- Venue
- The Economic Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1961-12
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 284
- Pages
- 709
- ISSN
- 0013-0133 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006676436
- Cited by
- 517
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
