The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Attitudes Toward Risk: Theoretical Implications of an Experiment in Rural India
Abstract
Hans P. Binswanger; Attitudes Toward Risk: Theoretical Implications of an Experiment in Rural India, The Economic Journal, Volume 91, Issue 364, 1 December 1981
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Friedman, R., Anderson, C., Brett, J., Olekalns, M., Goates, N., & Lisco, C. C. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.369 · Cited by 269
Ready or Not? How Citizens and Public Officials Perceive Risk and Preparedness
Donahue, A. K., Eckel, C. C., & Wilson, R. K. (2014) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/0275074013506517 · Cited by 141
Deal or No Deal? Decision Making under Risk in a Large-Payoff Game Show
Post, T., van den Assem, M. J., Baltussen, G., & Thaler, R. H. (2008) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.98.1.38 · Cited by 110
Pitt, M. M., & Sumodiningrat, G. (1991) · International Economic Review · doi:10.2307/2526886 · Cited by 60
Risk preferences and development revisited
Vieider, F. M., Martinsson, P., Nam, P. K., & Truong, N. (2019) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-018-9674-8 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Binswanger, H. P.
- Venue
- The Economic Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1981-12
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 364
- Pages
- 867
- ISSN
- 0013-0133 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2106109364
- Cited by
- 749
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
