Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 591

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Occupation of Biological Space During Seedling Establishment

Ross, M. A., Harper, John L.·1972·The Journal of Ecology

Abstract

gains access to resources necessary for its further growth and development. The term 'biological space' is used to cover this complex of resources. Such a simplification assumes that the requirements of individuals within a species are essentially similar. The object of this paper is to show the importance of the position of an individual in the overall ranking of emergence times, and its spatial separation from neighbours, in enabling it to occupy space to the exclusion of its neighbours. Most information on the performance of an individual within a population has come from work with mixed populations and this literature warrants consideration. A number of studies have been made on the temporal and spatial components of seedling interference, but the interaction of the two, interference in the dynamic context, has received less attention. The relative times at which different species are introduced into a mixture has been shown by a number of authors to produce dramatic changes in the outcome of interference between the components. When Sagar (1959) sowed S23 Lolium perenne and Plantago lanceolata simultaneously, Lolium contributed 80 % of the total plant dry weight at harvest. If Lolium were introduced 3 weeks before Plantago, the proportion contributed by Lolium rose to 90 %, but, sown 3 weeks after Plantago, Lolium contributed only 6.4 % of the total dry weight. A similar result was reported by Harper (1961) using two Bromus species. When B. rigidus and B. madritensis were sown simultaneously, the former contributed over 75 % of the final dry weight of the mixture. If the introduction of B. rigidus were delayed for 3 weeks, then the contribution by this species dropped to approximately 13 % of the total dry weight. Williams (1962) has repeated this effect in an agronomic context. He found that Chenopodium album reduced the yield of barley by 20 0 when the two were sown at the same time, but delaying barley sowing by 7 weeks allowed Chenopodium to reduce the yield of the barley by 45 %. The same effect with one species was shown by Black & Wilkinson (1963) using subterranean clover. They delayed planting alternate seeds within a grid pattern by 0, 2, 4 and 8 days, thus considerably increasing the range of emergence times within swards. By recording the final yield of each individual, they showed that a 5-day delay in the emergence of an individual reduced its final weight by 50 %, and a delay of 8 or 9 days, by at least 75 %. These differences could not be accounted for solely by differences in growing times between emergence and harvest. As early as 1938, Weaver & Clements described how an advantage gained by an individual over its neighbours was likely to be maintained or accentuated during subsequent

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2258041

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Ross, M. A., & Harper, J. L.
Venue
The Journal of Ecology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1972-03
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
77
ISSN
0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2319913518
Cited by
591
References
0
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Occupation of Biological Space During Seedling Establishment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2258041
The paper
Ross, M. A., & Harper, J. L. (1972). Occupation of Biological Space During Seedling Establishment. The Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2258041

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.