The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Light Requirements of Neotropical Tree Seedlings: A Comparative Study of Growth and Survival
Abstract
(1) Eighteen species of wind-dispersed trees on Barro Colorado Island, Panama, are compared with respect to germination, survival, and growth of seedlings during 1 year under sun and shade conditions in a screened enclosure. The species vary in their mean dry weight of seed from 1.9 mg to 686 mg. (2) High and synchronous germination occurs in both sun and shade for sixteen of the eighteen species. Most species have epigeal germination with leafy green cotyledons. (3) Seedlings of fifteen species survive better in sun than shade; none survive better in shade than sun. Survival in shade and in sun are positively correlated. Shade tolerance varies widely and continuously among the species; it correlates with adult wood density, an indicator of growth rate and successional status, but not with the dry weight of seed reserves. The more shade-tolerant species have a lower proportion of seedlings dying from disease in the shade. (4) Seedling height after 1 year is greater in sun than in shade for all species. In both sun and shade, growth rate and height at 1 year are not correlated with adult wood density or shade tolerance. Seed dry weight correlates with seedling height in both sun and shade at 4 weeks, but with height in shade only at 1 year. Seedlings in shade show no or slow growth after the initial growth has used the seed reserves. (5) In the shade, number and length of leaves show little or no change with time; leaf turnover is negligible. In the sun, leaf number increases and successively younger leaves mature at larger sizes. Leaf size is greater in the sun than in the shade Senescence of the leafy cotyledons is more rapid in sun than shade for all species. (6) This experimental study predicts that all species examined benefit from seed dispersal to light-gaps. Some species are restricted as seedlings to gaps, while others persist, but do not grow appreciably, in the shaded understorey. The implications of these differences in light requirements for the size-age structure and for the spatial pattern of the populations are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Shade Tolerance, a Key Plant Feature of Complex Nature and Consequences
Valladares, F., & Niinemets, Ü. (2008) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173506 · Cited by 1,620
The evolutionary ecology of seed size.
Leishman, M. R., Wright, I. J., Moles, A. T., & Westoby, M. (2000) · Seeds: the ecology of regeneration in plant communities · doi:10.1079/9780851994321.0031 · Cited by 1,014
Kitajima, K. (1994) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00324232 · Cited by 929
Zimmerman, J. K., III, E. M. E., Waide, R. B., Lodge, D. J., Taylor, C. M., & Brokaw, N. V. L. (1994) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2261454 · Cited by 451
Interspecific and Inter‐site Variation in Wood Specific Gravity of Tropical Trees
Muller‐Landau, H. C. (2004) · Biotropica · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2004.tb00292.x · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Augspurger, C. K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1984-11
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 777
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972772923
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Light Requirements of Neotropical Tree Seedlings: A Comparative Study of Growth and Survival. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2259531
- The paper
- Augspurger, C. K. (1984). Light Requirements of Neotropical Tree Seedlings: A Comparative Study of Growth and Survival. The Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2259531
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.