Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Photosynthetic Inorganic Carbon use by Freshwater Plants

Maberly, S. C., Spence, D. H. N.·1983·The Journal of Ecology

Abstract

SUMMARY (1) A pH-drift technique was used to calculate free CO2 (CO2) and bicarbonate (HCO ) compensation points for a range of freshwater macrophytes and phytoplankters. Some half-saturation constants for CO2 uptake were also estimated. The validity of the technique and interpretation is discussed and generally confirmed. (2) Variation in the CO* compensation point of Hippuris vulgaris was related to the oxygen concentration of the bathing medium, and seasonal changes in HCOcompensation point were found in Potamogeton filiformis and in HCOI and CO* compensation points in Elodea canadensis. The performance of these two macrophytes is probably affected more by seasonal changes in HCOI compensation points than by CO* compensation points. (3) The quotient of total carbon remaining at the end of a pH-drift experiment to the constant alkalinity of the solution (CT/Alk) was used as a measure of the uptake ability of a species. Ranked by this criterion, species showed a fairly continuous range in uptake ability with a nearly fifteen-fold difference between the most efficient (low quotient) and least efficient (high quotient) species. (4) Although the uptake abilities of macrophytes and phytoplankters overlapped, the four most efficient carbon extractors were phytoplankters, and the nine least efficient were macrophytes. Anabaena cylindrica, Microcystis aeruginosa and Scenedesmus quadricauda removed more than 90% of the available carbon compared with 70% for the most efficient macrophytes tested (Myriophyllum spicatum and Potamogeton perfoliatus). (5) Those species which remove 5% or less of the available carbon are taken to be unable or poorly able to use HCOi. Such 'macrophytes may benefit from: (i) growing in unproductive lakes that do not experience carbon depletion; (ii) seasonal access to aerial C02; (iii) high CO* concentrations in and close to the sediment. (6) Competition for inorganic carbon may be an important factor determining the outcome of seasonal and longer-term changes in the species composition of productive freshwaters. The reduction or loss of submerged macrophytes in certain recently enriched lakes may result partly from carbon competition with phytoplankton.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2259587

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Maberly, S. C., & Spence, D. H. N.
Venue
The Journal of Ecology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1983-11
Volume
71
Issue
3
Pages
705
ISSN
0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2328887212
Cited by
280
References
0
FWCI
6.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Photosynthetic Inorganic Carbon use by Freshwater Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2259587
The paper
Maberly, S. C., & Spence, D. H. N. (1983). Photosynthetic Inorganic Carbon use by Freshwater Plants. The Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2259587

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.