The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Seed Size and Growth Form on Seedling Establishment of Six Monocarpic Perennial Plants
Abstract
(1) Effects of seed size and seedling morphology on the establishment of six monocarpic perennials were examined in glasshouse experiments. Both withinand between-species comparisons of seed-size effects were made as seed weight varied by more than two orders of magnitude among species and by 3 to 20-fold within a species. Experiments were conducted in four ground-cover types: bare soil, litter cover, vegetated, and vegetated plus litter. (2) In vegetated cover, emergence of the two small-seeded species, Verbascum thapsus and Oenothera biennis, was significantly lower than in litter and bare soil. In contrast, emergence of the medium (Dacus carota and Dipsacus sylvestris) and large-seeded species (Tragopogon dubius and Arctium minus), was not significantly reduced in the presence of vegetation. Although the rate of emergence of all six species was significantly reduced in vegetated cover, there were no between species differences in seedling emergence rates in any cover type. (3) Relative growth rates of all six species were significantly lower in vegetated cover compared with litter and bare soil and the effect was greatest on the small-seeded species. At the end of the experiment, seedling weight in vegetated cover was positively correlated with seed weight. In non-competitive cover types (litter and bare soil), seedling weight was independent of initial seed weight. (4) Relative growth rates of seedlings in non-competitive cover types were inversely related to seed size. In bare soil and litter, the small-seeded species had relative growth rates twice those of the large-seeded species. In vegetated cover this pattern was reversed; the species with large seeds had the highest relative growth rates. (5) The growth form of a seedling did not have any effect on its probability of establishment in any cover type. Species with different growth forms and similar seed sizes had equal emergence, survival, and relative growth rates in all four cover types. (6) Within species differences in seed size had a significant effect on seedling growth in non-competitive cover, but had no effect on seedling growth in competitive cover. Thus, both withinand between-species differences in seed size had similar effects on seedling establishment success in different types of ground cover.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Correlates of Seed Size Variation: A Comparison Among Five Temperate Floras
Leishman, M. R., Westoby, M., & Jurado, E. (1995) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2261604 · Cited by 308
Reduction of growth and reproduction of Cyperus esculentus by specific crops
LOTZ, L. A. P., GROENEVELD, R. M. W., HABEKOTTÉ, B., & VAN OENE, H. (1991) · Weed Research · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.1991.tb01754.x · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Gross, K. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1984-07
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 369
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2323826491
- Cited by
- 461
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Seed Size and Growth Form on Seedling Establishment of Six Monocarpic Perennial Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2260053
- The paper
- Gross, K. L. (1984). Effects of Seed Size and Growth Form on Seedling Establishment of Six Monocarpic Perennial Plants. The Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2260053
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.