Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 637

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Photosynthetic Light Environments in a Lowland Tropical Rain Forest in Costa Rica

Chazdon, Robin L., Fetcher, Ned·1984·The Journal of Ecology

Abstract

SUMMARY (1) Measurements of photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) in four sites within a lowland tropical rain forest were compared. The habitats investigated were a 0.5 ha clearing, a 400 m2 gap, a 200 m2 gap, and heavily shaded understorey. (2) Measurements were made during both wet and dry seasons under a variety of weather conditions. Quantum sensors were used to monitor continuously 10-min average PPFD over a 3-10 day period at each location. Daily average PPFD, total daily PPFD, and daily frequency distributions were analysed for two adjacent sensors per site on each sampling day. (3) Daily total PPFD in the understorey, 200 m2 gap, and 400 m2 gap were 1-2%, 9%, and 20-35%, respectively, of PPFD in the clearing. Daily total PPFD in the 400 m2 gap during the dry season was, on average, 2.4 times greater than in the 200 m2 gap, and 20-25 times those in the understorey. In the 200 m2 gap, daily total PPFD was nine times greater than in the understorey during the dry season. (4) In the clearing, PPFD was significantly different between seasons with 24% higher PPFD during the dry season. In the 400 m2 gap and understorey, PPFD was not significantly different between seasons. (5) The percentage of available PPFD reaching the understorey was highest on cloudy, overcast days and lowest on sunny days. No correlation was found between daily total PPFD in the 400 m2 gap centre and in the adjacent understorey measured on the same days. (6) In the clearing, a high proportion of 10-min averages were greater than 500 ,umol m-2 s-I; in the 400 m2 gap, a high proportion of 10-min averages were between 100,umol m-2 s-1 and 500 umol m-2 s-1; in the understorey over 70% of the 10-min averages were below 10,urmol m-2 s-1. The clearing exhibited the greatest diurnal variation in PPFD and the least day-to-day variation, whereas the understorey exhibited the least diurnal variation and the greatest day-to-day variation in PPFD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2260066

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 637

Metadata

Authors
Chazdon, R. L., & Fetcher, N.
Venue
The Journal of Ecology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1984-07
Volume
72
Issue
2
Pages
553
ISSN
0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2333862156
Cited by
637
References
0
FWCI
26.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Photosynthetic Light Environments in a Lowland Tropical Rain Forest in Costa Rica. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2260066
The paper
Chazdon, R. L., & Fetcher, N. (1984). Photosynthetic Light Environments in a Lowland Tropical Rain Forest in Costa Rica. The Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2260066

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.