The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Photosynthetic Light Environments in a Lowland Tropical Rain Forest in Costa Rica
Abstract
SUMMARY (1) Measurements of photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) in four sites within a lowland tropical rain forest were compared. The habitats investigated were a 0.5 ha clearing, a 400 m2 gap, a 200 m2 gap, and heavily shaded understorey. (2) Measurements were made during both wet and dry seasons under a variety of weather conditions. Quantum sensors were used to monitor continuously 10-min average PPFD over a 3-10 day period at each location. Daily average PPFD, total daily PPFD, and daily frequency distributions were analysed for two adjacent sensors per site on each sampling day. (3) Daily total PPFD in the understorey, 200 m2 gap, and 400 m2 gap were 1-2%, 9%, and 20-35%, respectively, of PPFD in the clearing. Daily total PPFD in the 400 m2 gap during the dry season was, on average, 2.4 times greater than in the 200 m2 gap, and 20-25 times those in the understorey. In the 200 m2 gap, daily total PPFD was nine times greater than in the understorey during the dry season. (4) In the clearing, PPFD was significantly different between seasons with 24% higher PPFD during the dry season. In the 400 m2 gap and understorey, PPFD was not significantly different between seasons. (5) The percentage of available PPFD reaching the understorey was highest on cloudy, overcast days and lowest on sunny days. No correlation was found between daily total PPFD in the 400 m2 gap centre and in the adjacent understorey measured on the same days. (6) In the clearing, a high proportion of 10-min averages were greater than 500 ,umol m-2 s-I; in the 400 m2 gap, a high proportion of 10-min averages were between 100,umol m-2 s-1 and 500 umol m-2 s-1; in the understorey over 70% of the 10-min averages were below 10,urmol m-2 s-1. The clearing exhibited the greatest diurnal variation in PPFD and the least day-to-day variation, whereas the understorey exhibited the least diurnal variation and the greatest day-to-day variation in PPFD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neotropical secondary forest succession: changes in structural and functional characteristics
Guariguata, M. R., & Ostertag, R. (2001) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(00)00535-1 · Cited by 1,380
Messier, C., Parent, S., & Bergeron, Y. (1998) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.2307/3237266 · Cited by 375
Anthony, K. R. N., & Hoegh‐Guldberg, O. (2003) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2003.00731.x · Cited by 226
Jakovac, A. C. C., Bentos, T. V., Mesquita, R. C. G., & Williamson, G. B. (2014) · Plant Ecology & Diversity · doi:10.1080/17550874.2012.716088 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Chazdon, R. L., & Fetcher, N.
- Venue
- The Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1984-07
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 553
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2333862156
- Cited by
- 637
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Photosynthetic Light Environments in a Lowland Tropical Rain Forest in Costa Rica. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2260066
- The paper
- Chazdon, R. L., & Fetcher, N. (1984). Photosynthetic Light Environments in a Lowland Tropical Rain Forest in Costa Rica. The Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2260066
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.