Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Abandoned Pastures in Eastern Amazonia. II. Nutrient Stocks in the Soil and Vegetation

Buschbacher, R., Uhl, C., Serrao, E. A. S.·1988·The Journal of Ecology

Abstract

(1) Soil nutrient content was studied in relation to vegetation development on thirteen abandoned pastures differing in age from two to eight years and in intensity of pasture use from light to heavy. The surface soils of these sites had higher cation concentration and pH than those of undisturbed mature forest of the area, but similar phosphorus, organic matter and total nitrogen concentrations. (2) Soil nutrient concentration generally was independent of age or prior intensity of use in the pastures. Pasture use has a significant effect on soil nutrient concentration when the sites are first abandoned, but this does not persist. Nutrient uptake by successional vegetation may substantially reduce soil nutrient stocks. (3) Soil nutrient concentration was not significantly correlated with vegetation biomass, primary tree biomass or species richness, either among or within sites. (4) Nutrient depletion of pastures abandoned eight years previously relative to total nutrient stocks in mature forest depended on pasture disturbance. Sites previously subjected to low use were only depleted of N, moderate-use sites were depleted of N and K, and heavy-use sites were depleted of N, K, Mg and possibly Ca and P. There was less nutrient depletion than the relatively small biomass of the successional sites would indicate. This was due to a higher proportion of nutrient-rich leaves and fine branches, enriched soil nutrient stocks relative to mature forest and, on the lightly disturbed sites, a large pool of nutrients in unburned woody residue. (5) Decomposition of unburned woody residue may provide one-half of the nutrients taken up by vegetation during eight years of recovery following light pasture use, but only 15% following moderate use, and none following the most intense use. (6) General schemes of succession following deforestation for pasture development are presented. Recovery after disturbance is complex, and follows different patterns depending on the intensity of pasture use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2260567

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Buschbacher, R., Uhl, C., & Serrao, E. A. S.
Venue
The Journal of Ecology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1988-09
Volume
76
Issue
3
Pages
682
ISSN
0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2319625401
Cited by
268
References
1
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Abandoned Pastures in Eastern Amazonia. II. Nutrient Stocks in the Soil and Vegetation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2260567
The paper
Buschbacher, R., Uhl, C., & Serrao, E. A. S. (1988). Abandoned Pastures in Eastern Amazonia. II. Nutrient Stocks in the Soil and Vegetation. The Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2260567

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.