The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Exploitation of Patchily Distributed Soil Resources by the Clonal Herb Glechoma Hederacea
Abstract
1 To allow assessment of the ability of plants to exploit heterogeneous habitats, the growth of the stoloniferous herb Glechoma hederacea was compared in three artificial soil environments. In the control treatment named 'uniform', potting compost was evenly mixed with sand; the treatment named 'patchy' contained the same quantity of potting compost, but half was concentrated in a central resource-rich circle in each box. In the treatment named 'low', compost was distributed homogeneously as in the first treatment, but the total quantity of potting compost was halved. 2 The biomass of G. hederacea produced in the patchy treatment was over two and a half times that produced in the uniform treatment, and over ten times that produced in the low treatment. In addition, more leaves were produced in the patchy treatment than in the other two treatments. Almost twice as many stolons reached the perimeters of the boxes. in the patchy treatment as in the uniform treatment. However, the biomass of the portions of the clones that had no basipetal connections via stolons into the central circle did not differ between treatments. 3 There was little evidence that above-ground biomass or ramets were concentrated inside the central circle of the patchy treatment relative to the other two treatments. 4 In contrast, 80% of the root biomass of plants in the patchy treatment was concentrated within the resource-rich central circle. Contrary to the situation in plants grown in homogeneous conditions, root:shoot ratio was highest where soil-derived resources were locally most abundant. Inside the central circle, ramets developed roots earlier in the patchy treatment than in the uniform treatment; outside the central circle, ramets developed roots later in the patchy treatment than in the uniform treatment. 5 In a supplementary experiment the length of young root systems increased exponentially from whatever time their growth was initiated. Thus, local delay or advancement of the initiation of root growth, in response to variations in soil characteristics, could have generated the observed concentration of root biomass inside the central circle of the patchy treatment. 6 G. hederacea can exploit environmental heterogeneity through local functional specialization of plant parts. In many habitats, species that have this ability may outcompete those adapted solely to resource-poor conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Herbivore-mediated linkages between aboveground and belowground communities
Bardgett, R. D., & Wardle, D. A. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/02-0274 · Cited by 1,173
Morphological Plasticity in Clonal Plants: The Foraging Concept Reconsidered
de Kroons, H., & Hutchings, M. J. (1995) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2261158 · Cited by 554
Self-citationExploitation of environmental Hetergeneity by Spatial Division of Labor in a Clonal Plant
Stueffer, J. F., Kroon, H. D., & During, H. J. (1996) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.2307/2390280 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Birch, C. P. D., & Hutchings, M. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1994-09
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 653
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2327729539
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploitation of Patchily Distributed Soil Resources by the Clonal Herb Glechoma Hederacea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2261272
- The paper
- Birch, C. P. D., & Hutchings, M. J. (1994). Exploitation of Patchily Distributed Soil Resources by the Clonal Herb Glechoma Hederacea. The Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2261272
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.