The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CO 2 Fluxes from Peat in Boreal Mires under Varying Temperature and Moisture Conditions
Abstract
1 Co2 emissions in boreal peatlands were measured during two seasons on various mire site types representing different nutrient statuses and water tables. In order to examine the long term effects of water table draw-down on the CO2 fluxes, the sites also included 25-50-year-old drainages. 2 On virgin sites the lowest CO2 fluxes were measured at ombrotrophic sites dominated by Sphagnum fuscum (78-127mg CO2 m-2 h-' at 12 ?C, 60-200 g CO2-C m-2 year') and the highest CO2 fluxes were at ombrotrophic sites with abundant understorey vegetation (183-259mg CO2 m-2 h-' at 12 ?C, 290-340g C02-C m-2 year-'). 3 Lowering of the water table by 1 cm increased CO2 fluxes by an average of 7.1 mg COM2 h-' at 12 ?C and 9.5 g C02-C m-2 year-'. In some cases the effect of ditches on the water table, and correspondingly on CO2 fluxes, was small. However, effective draining caused 100% increase in CO2 fluxes. Drainages had higher CO2 fluxes compared with virgin subsites at the same temperature and water table. 4 The effect of temperature on CO2 fluxes depended on the water table, the average QIo value being 2.9 with water tables of 0-20cm and 2.0 with water tables below 20cm. 5 CO2 fluxes are compared with primary production figures, and peat carbon stores and the carbon balance in changing climate are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration?
Jandl, R., Lindner, M., Vesterdal, L., Bauwens, B., Baritz, R., Hagedorn, F., Johnson, D. W., Minkkinen, K., & Byrne, K. A. (2007) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.09.003 · Cited by 1,458
Impact of climate change on wetland ecosystems: A critical review of experimental wetlands
Salimi, S., Almuktar, S. A. A. A. N., & Scholz, M. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112160 · Cited by 580
Feedback control of the rate of peat formation
Belyea, L. R., & Clymo, R. S. (2001) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1665 · Cited by 344
Setti, L., Francia, E., Pulvirenti, A., Gigliano, S., Zaccardelli, M., Pane, C., Caradonia, F., Bortolini, S., Maistrello, L., & Ronga, D. (2019) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.017 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Silvola, J., Alm, J., Ahlholm, U., Nykanen, H., & Martikainen, P. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 219
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017173309
- Cited by
- 461
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CO 2 Fluxes from Peat in Boreal Mires under Varying Temperature and Moisture Conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2261357
- The paper
- Silvola, J., Alm, J., Ahlholm, U., Nykanen, H., & Martikainen, P. J. (1996). CO 2 Fluxes from Peat in Boreal Mires under Varying Temperature and Moisture Conditions. The Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2261357
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.