The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Restoration of Temperate Wetlands.
Abstract
Partial table of contents: Archaeology and Wetland Restoration (B. Coles). Assessing the Restoration Prospects of Degraded Fens (A. Grootjans & R. van Diggelen). The Role of Seed Banks in the Revegetation of Australian Temporary Wetlands (M. Brock & D. Britton). Planning for the Restoration of Peat Wetlands for Birds (D. Ward, et al.). The Ombrogenous Bog Environment (M. Proctor). Hydrological Protection and Rewetting of Raised Bogs Influenced by Man (R. Eggelsman). The Basis of Mire Restoration in Finland (H. Heikkila & T. Lindholm). Index.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Restoration Ecology: Repairing the Earth’s Ecosystems in the New Millennium
Hobbs, R. J., & Harris, J. A. (2001) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009002239.x · Cited by 905
Artificial drainage of peatlands: hydrological and hydrochemical process and wetland restoration
Holden, J., Chapman, P. J., & Labadz, J. C. (2004) · Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment · doi:10.1191/0309133304pp403ra · Cited by 550
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, P. D., Wheeler, B. D., Shaw, S. C., Fojt, W. J., & Richardson, R. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 323
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966030884
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Restoration of Temperate Wetlands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2261369
- The paper
- Moore, P. D., Wheeler, B. D., Shaw, S. C., Fojt, W. J., & Richardson, R. A. (1996). Restoration of Temperate Wetlands. The Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2261369
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.