Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,074

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

GLIM for Ecologists.

Turner, B. D., Crawley, M. J.·1994·The Journal of Ecology

Abstract

Preface An Ecological Example The GLIM Language Introduction to Experimental Design Understanding Data: Graphical Analysis Understanding Data: Basic Statistics Regression and GLIM Anova and GLIM Analysis of Covariance in GLIM Linear Models Model Simplification Model Criticism Analysing Count Data: Poisson Errors Analysing Proportion Data: Binomial Errors Binary Response Variables Data with Gamma Errors Survival Data Ecological Techniques What GLIM Doesn't Do Programming in GLIM Technical Appendices Statistical Tables Library of GLIM Programmes and Macros (on disk)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2261403

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,074

Metadata

Authors
Turner, B. D., & Crawley, M. J.
Venue
The Journal of Ecology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1994-03
Volume
82
Issue
1
Pages
212
ISSN
0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045125566
Cited by
2,074
References
0
FWCI
61.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GLIM for Ecologists. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2261403
The paper
Turner, B. D., & Crawley, M. J. (1994). GLIM for Ecologists. The Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2261403

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.