The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability in Invasive Nonindigenous Plants: A Hypothesis
Abstract
There are very few valid generalizations about invasive species, so that it is only possible to make weak, probabilistic predictions about which species will invade (Gilpin 1990; Daehler & Strong 1993). A phenomenon that has not received much attention, however, is the observation that, in alien environments, plants tend to be more vigorous and taller, producing more seeds than in their native distribution (Crawley 1987). The seed production of Chrysanthemoides monilifera (native to Sout'l Africa) in Australia and of Acacia longifolia (native to Australia) in South Africa is an order of magnitude higher where the plants are aliens (Noble 1989). The vigour and success of aliens in areas where they have been introduced has been attributed to both, more favourable environments, and to the release from natural phytophagous enemies (Crawley 1987). These alternatives can be evaluated according to two theories relating to resource allocation. The optimal defence hypothesis predicts that plants with limited resources will show trade-offs in biomass allocation among maintenance, growth, storage, reproduction, and defence (Coley et al. 1985; Bazzaz et al. 1987; Fagerstrom 1989; Herms & Mattson 1994; Lerdau et al. 1995). The environmental constraint hypothesis (Bryant et al. 1988), however, predicts that the evolution of defence mechanisms against herbivory will result in only minor reductions in growth. Resource availability is then the primary force determining whether there is surplus photosynthate available for allocation to secondary metabolism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The population biology of invasive species
Sakai, A. K., Allendorf, F. W., Holt, J. S., Lodge, D. M., Molofsky, J., With, K. A., Baughman, S., Cabin, R. J., Cohen, J. E., Ellstrand, N. C., et al. (2001) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114037 · Cited by 3,912
Evolutionary genetics of invasive species
Lee, C. E. (2002) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02554-5 · Cited by 1,771
Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions
Richards, C. L., Bossdorf, O., Muth, N. Z., Gurevitch, J., & Pigliucci, M. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00950.x · Cited by 1,456
Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions
Strayer, D. L., Eviner, V. T., Jeschke, J. M., & Pace, M. L. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.07.007 · Cited by 1,025
HIERRO, J. L., MARON, J. L., & CALLAWAY, R. M. (2005) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00953.x · Cited by 836
Metadata
- Authors
- Blossey, B., & Notzold, R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 887
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2135157956
- Cited by
- 1,906
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability in Invasive Nonindigenous Plants: A Hypothesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2261425
- The paper
- Blossey, B., & Notzold, R. (1995). Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability in Invasive Nonindigenous Plants: A Hypothesis. The Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2261425
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.