The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Experimental Comparison of Leaf Decomposition Rates in a Wide Range of Temperate Plant Species and Types
Abstract
1 An experimental multispecies screening of leaf decomposition rates was undertaken in order to identify and quantify general patterns in leaf decomposition rates in functional plant types and taxa. Functional species groups were characterized using whole-plant and whole-leaf features relevant to the functioning of plants in their natural environments. 2 The experiment included fresh leaf litters of 125 British vascular plant species, covering a wide range of life-forms, leaf habits and taxa. Preweighed litter samples were enclosed in two types of litter bags and exposed to natural weather conditions and soil-borne decomposers by burying them simultaneously in an experimental outdoor leaf-mould layer. 3 Relative litter dry weight losses showed largely similar patterns among species between both litter bag types, between 8 and 20-week burial periods in winter and between winter and summer burial. 4 Life-form, deciduous vs. evergreen habit, autumn coloration of leaf litter, family and evolutionary advancement sensu Sporne could each explain part of the variability in litter dry weight loss among species. The correlation with litter specific leaf area appeared confounded with taxonomy. 5 Some of these easy-to-assess predictors of species' relative leaf decomposition rates may prove useful for modelling soil decomposition rates under vegetations differing in species composition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
Aber, J. D., Melillo, J. M., & McClaugherty, C. A. (1990) · Canadian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1139/b90-287 · Cited by 529
Šlapokas, T., & Granhall, U. (1991) · Biology and Fertility of Soils · doi:10.1007/bf00337374 · Cited by 45
Cited by
Cornwell, W. K., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Amatangelo, K., Dorrepaal, E., Eviner, V. T., Godoy, O., Hobbie, S. E., Hoorens, B., Kurokawa, H., Pérez‐Harguindeguy, N., et al. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01219.x · Cited by 2,855
Self-citationTRY – a global database of plant traits
KATTGE, J., DÍAZ, S., LAVOREL, S., PRENTICE, I. C., LEADLEY, P., BÖNISCH, G., GARNIER, E., WESTOBY, M., REICH, P. B., WRIGHT, I. J., et al. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02451.x · Cited by 2,638
Self-citationBiodiversity and Litter Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems
Hättenschwiler, S., Tiunov, A. V., & Scheu, S. (2005) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.112904.151932 · Cited by 1,674
The plant traits that drive ecosystems: Evidence from three continents
Diaz, S., Hodgson, J. G., Thompson, K., Cabido, M., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Jalili, A., Montserrat‐Martí, G., Grime, J. P., Zarrinkamar, F., Asri, Y., et al. (2004) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02266.x · Cited by 1,650
Self-citationFunctional traits, the phylogeny of function, and ecosystem service vulnerability
Díaz, S., Purvis, A., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Mace, G. M., Donoghue, M. J., Ewers, R. M., Jordano, P., & Pearse, W. D. (2013) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.601 · Cited by 644
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cornelissen, J. H. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996-08
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 573
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2318829891
- Cited by
- 588
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Experimental Comparison of Leaf Decomposition Rates in a Wide Range of Temperate Plant Species and Types. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2261479
- The paper
- Cornelissen, J. H. C. (1996). An Experimental Comparison of Leaf Decomposition Rates in a Wide Range of Temperate Plant Species and Types. The Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2261479
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.