The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diversity and Temporal Change in the Effective Pollinators of Asclepias Tuberosa
Abstract
Although pollination effectiveness is a central process underlying the evolution of plant and pollinator traits, it is difficult to measure and has rarely been reported for a diverse spectrum of visitors under natural conditions. We measured the effectiveness of all common flower visitors to Asclepias tuberosa (butterfly weed) at a site in southeastern Arizona, in terms of visitation rate, per—visit rate of pollinia removal and insertion, and pollinia load. Bombus and Apis (Hymenoptera) were the most effective pollinators, counter to predictions that A. tuberosa is butterfly—pollinated. We also documented large differences between 2 yr in the pollination effectiveness of visitors, primarily due to changes in visitation rate. Bombus were the most frequent and effective pollinators in 1992. In 1993, Apis were equivalent to Bombus. Battus (Lepidoptera) were the second most effective pollinators in 1992, but were scarce in 1993. Thus, conclusions about the identity of effective pollinators based on floral traits, casual observations of visitation, or even precise measurement of effectiveness in a single season are all potentially suspect. We compare our results to those of previous studies of Asclepias pollination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments
Hurlbert, S. H. (1984) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942661 · Cited by 8,377
Cited by
Interaction frequency as a surrogate for the total effect of animal mutualists on plants
Vázquez, D. P., Morris, W. F., & Jordano, P. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00810.x · Cited by 599
A framework for comparing pollinator performance: effectiveness and efficiency
Ne'eman, G., Jürgens, A., Newstrom‐Lloyd, L., Potts, S. G., & Dafni, A. (2010) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2009.00108.x · Cited by 431
Ollerton, J. (1996) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2261338 · Cited by 266
Optimality modeling and fitness trade‐offs: when should plants become pollinator specialists?
Aigner, P. A. (2001) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.950121.x · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Fishbein, M., & Venable, D. L.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1061-1073
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2062701035
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diversity and Temporal Change in the Effective Pollinators of Asclepias Tuberosa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2265576
- The paper
- Fishbein, M., & Venable, D. L. (1996). Diversity and Temporal Change in the Effective Pollinators of Asclepias Tuberosa. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2265576
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.