CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 405

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using Landscape Indices to Predict Habitat Connectivity

Schumaker, Nathan H.·1996·Ecology
DOI 10.2307/2265590
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2265590

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Before the emergence of landscape resistance as a framework for mapping connectivity, some agent-based models did incorporate more detailed aspects of individual movement choice.

    “Before the emergence of landscape resistance as a framework for mapping connectivity, some agent-based models did incorporate more detailed aspects of individual movement choice38,39, but the lack of spatial complexity in these earlier methods greatly limited their effective application to conservation science.”

    From Connectivity modelling in conservation science: a comparative evaluation (2022) · cites this paper as [39]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schumaker, N. H.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-06
Volume
77
Issue
4
Pages
1210-1225
ISSN
  • 0012-9658
  • 1939-9170
DOI
10.2307/2265590
Cited by
405
References
1
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review