The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High Survival of Darwin's Finch Hybrids: Effects of Beak Morphology and Diets
Abstract
Three species of Darwin's finches (Geospiza fortis, G. scandens, and G. fuliginosa) hybridize rarely on the small Galapagos island of Daphne Major. Following the exceptionally severe El Nino event of 1982—1983, hybrids survived as well as, and in some cases better than, the parental species during dry seasons of potential food limitation. They also backcrossed to two of the parental species. This study was undertaken to compare the diets of hybrids with the diets of the parental species in order to assess possible reasons for the high hybrid survival. Diets of F hybrids and first generation backcrosses to G. fortis were intermediate between the diets of the respective parental species. Distinctiveness of the hybrid diets was most pronounced where the diets of the parental species differed most. A strong determinant was beak morphology; hybrids inherit beak traits from both parents, and, on average, have intermediate beak sizes. Among the combined groups of species and hybrids, and among the hybrids alone, dietary characteristics covaried with beak morphology. Hybrids that differ most from G. fortis in beak morphology, the G. fortis x G. scandens F hybrids, experience a feeding efficiency advantage when feeding on Opuntia echios seeds, commonly consumed in the dry season. These findings are used to interpret the higher survival of hybrids after 1983 than beforehand. The El Nino event that year led to an enduring (10—yr) change in the habitat and plant composition of the island. A decrease in absolute and relative abundance of large and hard seeds apparently caused relatively high mortality among G. scandens and the largest G. fortis individuals. Hybrids were favored by an abundance of small seeds. The high survival of G. fortis x G. scandens F hybrids may have been due, additionally, to a broad diet and to efficient exploitation of Opuntia seeds. The study demonstrates long—term ecological and evolutionary consequences of large—scale fluctuations in climate, and the role of ecological (food) factors in determining hybrid fitness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hybridization and adaptive radiation
Seehausen, O. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.01.003 · Cited by 1,627
Mallet, J. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05706 · Cited by 1,595
Genetics and the Fitness of Hybrids
Burke, J. M., & Arnold, M. L. (2001) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.35.102401.085719 · Cited by 558
Ecological speciation in sticklebacks: environment-dependent hybrid fitness
Hatfield, T., & Schluter, D. (1999) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2640726 · Cited by 459
A Statistical Approach for Distinguishing Hybridization and Incomplete Lineage Sorting
Joly, S., McLenachan, P. A., & Lockhart, P. J. (2009) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/600082 · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- Grant, B. R., & Grant, P. R.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 500-509
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W1977122853
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High Survival of Darwin's Finch Hybrids: Effects of Beak Morphology and Diets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2265625
- The paper
- Grant, B. R., & Grant, P. R. (1996). High Survival of Darwin's Finch Hybrids: Effects of Beak Morphology and Diets. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2265625
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.